Premier Fabrics Inc v. Woodland Trading Inc et al
Premier Fabrics Inc |
Ross Stores Inc, Woodland Trading Inc and Does |
1:2013cv07522 |
October 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Lewis A. Kaplan |
Copyrights |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal in this case [DI 44] was not effective. Defendants' motion for attorney fees is dismissed as premature [DI 45]. Defendants' motion to dismiss [DI 40] is granted to the extent that plaintiffs claim for vicarious or contributory copyright infringement against Ross is dismissed; it is denied in all other respects. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 8/28/2014) (cd) |
Filing 51 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 45 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Woodland Trading Inc, Ross Stores Inc, 40 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Woodland Trading Inc, Ross Stores Inc. For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal in this case [DI 44]was not effective. Defendants' motion for attorney fees is dismissed as premature [DI 45]. Defendants' motion to dismiss [DI 40] is granted to the extent that plaintiff's claim for vicarious or contributory copyright infringement against Ross is dismissed; it is denied in all other respects. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 8/26/2014) (ama) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.