Osby v. The New York City Dept. of Probation
Plaintiff: Tammy S. Osby
Defendant: City of New York
Case Number: 1:2013cv08826
Filed: December 11, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Thomas P. Griesa
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 51 OPINION re: 39 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by City of New York. In sum, plaintiff's allegations of adverse employment actions fail to state claims for descrimination or retaliation under the ADA for one of the following reasons: (1) they are time-barred; (2) they are not, in fact, adverse employment actions; or (3) they fail to plausibly allege a nexus between the adverse action and discriminatory or retaliatory animus. Further, plaintiff's motion to amend is denied as futile. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 9/22/2017) (mro)
August 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 28 OPINION: Osby has not stated plausible claims for discrimination or retaliation under the ADA, and, accordingly, her complaint is dismissed in its entirety. The dismissal is without prejudice, however, and the court grants Osby leave to file an amended complaint as to plaintiff's claims for discrimination and retaliation under the ADA. (As further set forth in this Opinion) (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 8/15/2016) (kl)
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 OPINION re: 7 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint. filed by City of New York. Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The motion is granted. The court dismisses plaintiffs complaint in its entirety. This opinion resolves item #7 on the docket. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 8/19/2014) (kgo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osby v. The New York City Dept. of Probation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy S. Osby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?