Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC et al
| Trevor Murray |
| UBS Securities, LLC and UBS AG |
| 1:2014cv00927 |
| February 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
396
ORDER: On September 26, 2022, this case was remanded to this Court for a new trial. (Dkt. #395). Accordingly, the parties are hereby ORDERED to meet and confer, and to send to the Court a joint letter discussing proposed next steps in this case, by October 17, 2022. In this letter, the parties shall indicate their availability for trial in the third and fourth quarters of 2023. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 9/27/2022) (rro)
|
|
Filing
384
JUDGMENT. It is, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated December 16, 2020, the Court's Order dated September 25, 2018, and in accordance with the jury's verdict in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, Plaintiff is awarded back pay damages in the amount of $653,300.00; non-economic compensatory damages in the amount of $250,000.00; no front pay damages; prejudgment interest from February 20, 2012, thro ugh the date of entry of judgment using a weighted average prime rate of 3.57%, compounded annually; attorneys' fees to Stulberg & Walsh, LLP, the successor firm to Broach & Stulberg LLP, in the amount of $1,295,116.02, and litigati on costs in the amount of $128,428.81; and attorneys' fees to Herbst Law PLLC in the amount of $344,807.55, and litigation costs in the amount of $1,035.14. Accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/16/20) (yv)
|
|
Filing
154
OPINION AND ORDER: on re: 141 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 139 Memorandum & Opinion, / Notice of Defendants' Motion for Partial Reconsideration of the Court's March 31, 2017 Opinion and Order, filed by UBS Securiti es, LLC, UBS AG. Motions terminated: 141 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 139 Memorandum & Opinion / Notice of Defendants' Motion for Partial Reconsideration of the Court's March 31, 2017 Opinion and Order. filed by UBS Securities, LLC, UBS AG. During a conference held on July 14, 2017, the Court issued to the parties an oral opinion denying Defendants' partial motion for reconsideration. At the parties' request, the Court also ordered on the record that certain names be redacted from the transcript of the July 14, 2017 conference. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket Entry 141. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 7/17/2017) (ap)
|
|
Filing
147
REDACTED OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The parties shall appear via telephone for a conference with the Court on April 14, 2017, at 4:30 p.m. to discuss a schedule for trial in this matter. The parties shall contact Chambers at (212) 805-0290 with all parties present on the line. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 3/31/2017) (cla)
|
|
Filing
139
OPINION AND ORDER re: 98 MOTION for Summary Judgment/NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by UBS Securities, LLC, UBS AG. On March 31, 2017, the Court issued to the parties an Opinion and Order denying Defendants' motion for summary judgment. By April 13, 2017, the parties shall submit to the Court a joint proposal for redactions to that Opinion and Order, after which a redacted version will be filed on the Court's electronic docket. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket Entry 98. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 3/31/2017) (mro)
|
|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER re: 32 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the alternative to stay filed by UBS Securities, LLC, UBS AG: The Court declines to dismiss the Amended Complaint in its entirety, finding that because the statutory waitin g periods barred suit on Plaintiff's Sarbanes-Oxley and CFPA claims at the time of his earlier Dodd-Frank suit, the claims are not impermissibly duplicative. The Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss with regard to Plaintiff' ;s CFPA claims, finding that he was not a covered employee within the meaning of the statute. And finally, the Court declines to stay the remaining Sarbanes-Oxley claim due to the interest of the Court and the parties in a speedy resolution. T he Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Entry 32. Defendants' answer to the Amended Complaint shall be due no later than March 13, 2015. The parties are directed to appear before the Court for an initial pretrial conference on Apri l 7, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. The parties are further directed to submit a joint status letter and Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, the template of which is available on the Court's website, no later than April 2, 2015. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/24/2015) (tn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
