United Realty Advisors, LP et al v. Verschleiser et al
| United Realty Advisors, LP and Jacob Frydman |
| Eli Verschleiser, Raul Delforno, Ophir Parnasi and Alexandru Onica |
| 1:2014cv05903 |
| July 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
638
ORDER: The plaintiffs are directed to respond to Defendant Ophir Pinhasi's motion for attorney's fees and costs, ECF No. 635 in No. 14-cv-5903, by April 26, 2024. Defendant Ophir Pinhasi may reply by May 10, 2024. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/12/2024) ( Responses due by 4/26/2024, Replies due by 5/10/2024.) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (ks)
|
|
Filing
632
OPINION AND ORDER re: (614 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK) MOTION for Attorney Fees . filed by Jacob Frydman, United Realty Advisors, LP, Prime United Holdings, LLC. Thus, the requested costs for Eckert are reduced to $15,686.06. In li ght of all the above, the plaintiffs are entitled to a total award of $15,686.06 in costs. The Court has considered all of the parties' arguments. To the extent not specifically addressed above, those arguments are either moot or witho ut merit. For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiffs' motion for an award of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c) and 18 U.S.C. § 2707(c) is granted. The plaintiffs are awarded attorney's fees in the reduc ed amount of $291,284.46, and costs in the reduced amount of $15,686.06, for a total award of fees and costs of $306,970.52. Pursuant to the Judgment, Verschleiser and Multi Group are jointly and severally liable for that award. The Clerk is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 614. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/23/2023) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (ks) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
|
|
Filing
630
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: (618 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 498 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK) MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law filed by Eli Verschleiser. The Court has considered all of the parties' arguments. To the extent not specifically addressed above, those arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the defendant's postjudgment motion for relief pursuant to Rules 50, 59, and 60 is denied in full. The Clerk is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 618. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/18/2023) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (mml)
|
|
Filing
628
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the defendant's reply in support of his postjudgment motion (ECF No. 507 in Case No. 14-cv-8084). The defendant is directed to provide the Court with courtesy copies of all papers filed in connection with the fully briefed postjudgment motion (ECF No. 618 in Case No. 14-cv-5903). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/13/2023) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (ks)
|
|
Filing
627
ORDER: The defendant's reply in support of the postjudgment motion (ECF No. 618) was due on February 2, 2023, which has passed. See ECF No. 621. The time for the defendant to file a reply is extended to February 10, 2023. If no reply is filed by that date, the Court will decide the motion on the current papers. SO ORDERED. ( Replies due by 2/10/2023.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/6/2023) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
626
ORDER with respect to (614) Motion for Attorney Fees in case 1:14-cv-05903-JGK. The plaintiffs are directed to provide the Court with courtesy copies of all papers filed in connection with the fully briefed motion for attorneys' fees (ECF No. 614). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/28/2023) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (va)
|
|
Filing
621
ORDER The plaintiffs may respond to the defendant's post-judgment motion (ECF No. 618) on or before January 20, 2023. The reply is due on February 2, 2023. SO ORDERED. (Replies due by 2/2/2023., Responses due by 1/20/2023) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/28/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (jca)
|
|
Filing
586
CORRECTED ORDER: The plaintiffs should file a proposed judgment in this action by November 14, 2022. The defendants may respond by November 17, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/8/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (ks)
|
|
Filing
582
ORDER: The plaintiffs are reminded that they must file a list of witnesses, exhibits to be introduced through those witnesses, objections, and responses thereto at least two days before each witness testifies, in accordance with this Court's A ugust 5, 2022 Order. See ECF No. 550. Thus, to the extent the witnesses to be called on October 26, 2022, differ from those previously disclosed to the Court in the plaintiffs' October 20, 2022 submission (ECF No. 578), the plaintiffs' list containing the names of those witnesses, the corresponding exhibits, and any objections and responses thereto must be filed today, October 24, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/24/2022) (ks)
|
|
Filing
580
ORDER: Counsel for the plaintiffs should be prepared to explain the plaintiffs' position with respect to the defendants' request for an adjournment of trial (ECF No. 579). Irrespective of the Court's ruling on the request for an adjo urnment, because there are legal issues to be considered, all remaining parties and counsel for the parties should be present in court as planned at 9:00 a.m. tomorrow, October 24, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/23/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (ks)
|
|
Filing
577
ORDER: As discussed at the pretrial conference on October 6, 2022, the parties should submit hard copies of all exhibits that they may introduce at trial by tomorrow, October 20, 2022. The parties are further directed to submit electronic copies of all exhibits that they may introduce at trial, either on USB drives or via email to chambers in a zip. file format, by tomorrow, October 20, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/19/2022) (tg)
|
|
Filing
576
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: (457 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK, 567 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK) MOTION in Limine to exclude specific evidence offered by Plaintiffs. filed by Eli Verschleiser. Therefore, the defendants' only argument of unfa ir prejudice evaporates, and the defendants have failed to show why the relevance of the testimony is outweighed by any danger of unfair prejudice. See Fed. R. Evict. 403. The motion in limine is therefore denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/17/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (jca)
|
|
Filing
569
ORDER with respect to (567) Motion in Limine in case 1:14-cv-05903-JGK. As discussed at the pretrial conference on October 6, 2022, the plaintiffs' response to the defendants' motion in limine filed on October 7, 2022 (ECF No. 567) is due on October 12, 2022. The defendants' reply is due on October 13, 2022. The defendants are directed to provide the Court with courtesy copies of all papers filed in connection with the motion in limine once the motion is fully briefed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/10/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (va)
|
|
Filing
568
ORDER: The parties are directed to file on the docket their joint witness list containing the stricken names that need not be read aloud during voir dire. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/5/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (kv)
|
|
Filing
566
ORDER The parties are directed to review the attached Exhibit A, which is a list of potential names that the jury may hear in the course of trial based on the parties' submissions. The parties are directed to strike the names of any individuals or entities on the attached list that the parties do not reasonably expect to be mentioned at trial. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/5/2022) (jca)
|
|
Filing
565
ORDER: The final pretrial conference scheduled for October 6, 2022 at 10 a.m. will be held by telephone. Dial-in: 888-363-4749, with access code 8140049. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/4/2022) ( Telephone Conference set for 10/6/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge John G. Koeltl.) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (ks)
|
|
Filing
557
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has considered all of the parties' arguments. To the extent not discussed above, the arguments are either moot or without merit. The plaintiffs' application to take the testimony of Brian Buehler and Intermedia.net by contemporaneous transmission is denied. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/6/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (ks)
|
|
Filing
556
ORDER denying 555 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application denied. The Court already denied another request to adjourn the trial date because of a previously scheduled trip. This request is also untimely, coming twenty-five days after the Court set the firm trial date. So ordered.. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 8/30/2022) (jca)
|
|
Filing
549
ORDER granting 548 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Adjourned to Friday, August 5, 2022, at 2:30pm. Dial-in: (888) 363-4749. Access Code: 8140049. SO ORDERED. Telephone Conference set for 8/5/2022 at 02:30 PM before Judge John G. Koeltl. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 7/13/2022) (ate)
|
|
Filing
544
ORDER ADJOURNING TRIAL: Due to a family health emergency, the June 13, 2022, trial date in this matter is adjourned. The Court will provide timely notice to the parties when a new trial date is assigned. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Bernard A. Friedman on 6/13/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-BAF, 1:14-cv-08084-BAF. (mml)
|
|
Filing
543
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTRODUCE THE DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF ALEXANDER VEEN re: (430 in 1:14-cv-08084-BAF) MOTION to Expedite Plaintiffs expedited motion Re: Extraordinary Circumstances Warranting Us e of Non-Party Veen Deposition. filed by Prime United Holdings, LLC, Jacob Frydman, United Realty Advisors, L.P.. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to introduce the deposition testimony of Alexander Veen (14-CV-80 84, ECF No. 430) is denied. Both parties are precluded from introducing this testimony at trial. (Signed by Judge Bernard A. Friedman SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SITTING BY SPECIAL DESIGNATION on 6/10/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-BAF, 1:14-cv-08084-BAF (ks)
|
|
Filing
539
ORDER re: (534 in 1:14-cv-05903-BAF) Letter, filed by Raul Del Forno; (538 in 1:14-cv-05903-BAF) Letter, filed by Eli Verschleiser. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motions to adjourn trial (ECF Nos. 534, 538) are denied. (Signed by Judge Bernard A. Friedman on 6/7/2022) (va)
|
|
Filing
527
AMENDED TRIAL NOTICE: To All Counsel and All Pro Se Defendants: Be advised that the trial in this matter will commence with jury selection on Monday, June 13, 2022, at 9:00 a.m., at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl S treet, New York, New York. The parties are to inquire with the Clerk's Office to learn the courtroom number. The trial schedule will be Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. with fifteen-minute breaks in the morning and afternoon an d a one-hour lunch break. Each side is limited to a total of forty-five hours to argue and to examine and cross-examine witnesses. The parties' proposed joint final pretrial order, as well as any proposed voir dire questions, are due by June 1 , 2022. A joint (stipulated) set of jury instructions is due by the first day of trial. If any specific instructions are disputed, each side is to present its requested version along with supporting authority. The parties are required to inform the Court of any settlement or anticipated trial delay by June 6, 2022. The expense to the United States of bringing jurors to the courthouse for a trial may be assessed to one or more of the parties or counsel if the jury trial is not begun as sch eduled or the jurors are not used for that trial for any reason attributable to the parties or counsel. The Court intends to seat eight jurors using the striking method. Under the striking method, the Court will place fourteen prospective jurors in the jury box and replace any who are excused for cause. Following voir dire, the Court will provide each side with a form on which they will simultaneously write the names of the prospective jurors who each side wishes to excuse peremptorily. T hose prospective jurors will be excused. Plaintiffs collectively may exercise three peremptory challenges. Defendants collectively may exercise three peremptory challenges. If fewer than six prospective jurors are excused (due to overlap or to a sh ortfall in the peremptory challenges exercised), then the jury will consist of the first eight prospective jurors who have not been excused. All trial exhibits must be marked (e.g., P-1, P-2, etc.; D-1, D-2, etc.) in advance of trial and each side must exchange its exhibit books, as well as any demonstrative exhibits, with each other no later than one week before trial. Additionally, each side must provide the Court with two copies of its exhibit book (one for the Court and one for the Court 's clerks). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Bernard A. Friedman on 4/29/2022) ( Jury Selection set for 6/13/2022 at 09:00 AM in Clerk's Office, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Bernard A. Friedman., Jury Trial set for 6/13/2022 at 09:00 AM in Clerk's Office, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Bernard A. Friedman.) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-BAF, 1:14-cv-08084-BAF (ks)
|
|
Filing
525
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re: (522 in 1:14-cv-05903-BAF) MOTION for Discovery. filed by Eli Verschleiser, (423 in 1:14-cv-08084-BAF) MOTION for Discovery. filed by Eli Verschleiser. IT IS ORDERED that defendant Eli Verschleisers motion for reconsideration is denied. (Signed by Senior Judge Bernard A. Friedman on 4/22/22, SITTING BY SPECIAL DESIGNATION) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-BAF, 1:14-cv-08084-BAF (yv)
|
|
Filing
515
ORDER ADJOURNING TRIAL. Due to the coronavirus outbreak, and the unavailability of courtroom space for the foreseeable future, the October 19, 2020, trial date in this matter is adjourned. The trial will be rescheduled when a courtroom becomes ava ilable and the trial can be conducted in a matter that safeguards the safety of the parties, counsel, witnesses, jurors, and Court staff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Bernard A. Friedman, SITTING BY SPECIAL DESIGNATION on 8/12/20) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-BAF, 1:14-cv-08084-BAF (yv)
|
|
Filing
513
ORDER: By Orders of Reference dated June 3, 2020 (Dkt. Nos. 414, 512), Judge Friedman referred the above-captioned cases to me for settlement. The parties are directed to advise the Court within 30 days of the date of this Order when they wish to schedule a settlement conference. The parties should do so by filing a letter-motion on the docket that indicates at least three dates that are mutually convenient for the parties. Alternatively, counsel are free to e-mail my deputy clerk, David Tam, at David_Tam@nysd.uscourts.gov to find a mutually convenient date for the parties and the Court. Given the state's extension of the current stay-at-home policy in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, any settlement conference in the fore seeable future will likely be conducted telephonically. Using the Court's conference line system, the Court will begin the settlement conference in joint session with all parties on the line before breaking into private session and speaking t o the parties individually, as the technology the Court is using can facilitate breakout sessions with each side. The Court will email a copy of this Order to all pro se defendants in the above-referenced cases. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 6/3/2020) (jca)
|
|
Filing
511
ORDER RESCHEDULING TRIAL: Due to the coronavirus outbreak, the June 15, 2020, trial in these consolidated matters is here by rescheduled for Monday, October 19, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. ( Jury Selection set for 10/19/2020 at 09:00AM before Judge Bernard A. Friedman., Jury Trial set for 10/19/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Bernard A. Friedman.) (Signed by Judge Bernard A. Friedman on 4/2/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-BAF, 1:14-cv-08084-BAF (cf) (Main Document 511 replaced on 4/2/2020) (cf).
|
|
Filing
509
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ADJOURN TRIAL denying 508 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Accordingly, on January 9, the Court issued an amended trial notice resetting the trial for June 15. The trial is expected to last approximat ely two weeks. Given the Court's own busy schedule, and the limited availability of courtrooms for visiting judges at the federal courthouse in Manhattan, June 15-26 is the only two-week period in the reasonably foreseeable future when this case, which is now nearly six years old, can be tried. Under these circumstances, defendant Verschleiser's motion to adjourn the trial must be denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Bernard A. Friedman on 1/23/2020) (jca)
|
|
Filing
507
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ADJOURN THE TRIAL granting (504) Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference in case 1:14-cv-05903-BAF; granting (406) Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference in case 1:14-cv-08084-BAF.Plaintiffs have filed a letter mo tion in this matter [docket entry 504 in 14-cv-5903, docket entry 406 in 14-cv-8084] requesting that the trial be adjourned because their attorney will undergo surgery in February 2020. For cause shown, and in the absence of any objection from defend ants, the motion is granted. Trial will commence on Monday, June 15, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. (Jury Trial set for 6/15/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Bernard A. Friedman.) (Signed by Judge Bernard A. Friedman, Sitting By Designation on 1/9/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-BAF, 1:14-cv-08084-BAF (rro)
|
|
Filing
503
TRIAL NOTICE: Be advised that the trial in this matter will commence with jury selection on Monday, March 2, 2020, at 9:00 a.m., at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. The parties are to inqu ire with the Clerk's Office to learn the courtroom number. The trial schedule will be Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. with fifteen-minute breaks in the morning and afternoon and a one-hour lunch break. Each side is limited t o a total of forty-five hours to argue and to examine and cross-examine witnesses. The parties' proposed joint final pretrial order, as well as any proposed voir dire questions, are due by February 21, 2020. All trial exhibits must be marked (e.g., P-1, P-2, etc.; D-1, D-2, etc.) in advance of trial and each side must exchange its exhibit books, as well as any demonstrative exhibits, with each other no later than one week before trial. Additionally, each side must provide the Court wi th two copies of its exhibit book (one for the Court, one for the Court's clerks). (And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Pretrial Order due by 2/21/2020., Jury Selection set for 3/2/2020 at 09:00AM before Judge Bernard A. Friedman.) (Signed by Senior United States District Judge Bernard A. Friedman, Sitting by Special Designation on 12/20/2019) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-BAF, 1:14-cv-08084-BAF(jca)
|
|
Filing
502
ORDER TO UPDATE THE PARTIES' CONTACT INFORMATION: The Court has reviewed the docket sheets in these matters and notes that they lack complete contact information for pro se defendants Eli Verschleiser, Raul Del Forno, Ophir Pinhasi, and Alexan dru Onica. To rectify this oversight, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court update the docket sheets in the above-referenced matters to reflect the following contact information as it pertains to each defendant. The Court also notes that t he docket sheet for civil action number 14-cv-8084 indicates that plaintiff Jacob Frydman is pro se; however, plaintiff Frydman is currently represented by attorney Neal Brickman. Therefore, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court delete plai ntiff Frydman's pro se contact information from the docket sheet for civil action number 14-cv-8084. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pro se defendants Raul Del Forno and Ophir Pinhasi provide their telephone numbers to the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). They may do so by mailing a letter with this information, addressed to the Clerk of Court at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of the pro se defendants and att orneys of record promptly notify the Court if (1) any of the contact information contained on page 1 of this order is incorrect, and (2) any of their addresses or telephone numbers change. (And as further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Bernard A. Friedman, Sitting by Special Designation on 12/6/2019) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-BAF, 1:14-cv-08084-BAF(jca)
|
|
Filing
493
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: (412 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 317 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK) MOTION in Limine Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiffs from Offering Evidence Related to Our Place In NY, Inc. or Magenu.. filed by Eli Verschleiser , (491 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 393 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK) LETTER MOTION for Conference re: (308 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK, 403 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK) MOTION in Limine Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiffs from Offering Evidence that Has Not Been Produced and Evidence Whose Relevance is Unsupported by Evi filed by Jacob Frydman, United Realty Advisors, LP, United Realty Advisors, L.P., (308 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK, 403 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK) MOTION in Limine Motion in Limine to Exclu de Plaintiffs from Offering Evidence that Has Not Been Produced and Evidence Whose Relevance is Unsupported by Evidence that Has Been Produced. filed by Eli Verschleiser, (326 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK, 421 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK) MOTION in Limine Preclude Veens Testimony and Evidence Obtained By Him. filed by Eli Verschleiser, (314 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK, 409 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK) MOTION in Limine Exclude Plaintiffs from Offering Evidence of Defendants Prior Arrest History, Cr iminal History, or Drug History. filed by Eli Verschleiser, (406 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 311 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK) MOTION in Limine Exclude Transcript and Recording of Conversation Between Gould and Verschleiser. filed by Eli Verschl eiser, (385 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 290 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK) MOTION in Limine Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiffs from Offering Evidence that Has Not Been Produced and Evidence Whose Relevance is Unsupported by Evidence that Has Been Produc ed.. filed by Raul Delforno, Alex Onica, Multi Capital Group of Companies, L.L.C., Eli Verschleiser, Ophir Parnasi, (329 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK, 424 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK) MOTION in Limine Preclude Veens Recordings and Evidence Related . filed by Eli Verschleiser, (323 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK, 418 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK) MOTION in Limine Preclude Testimony that is the Subject of Plaintiffs' Precluded Expert Testimony. filed by Eli Verschleiser, (386 in 1:14-cv-059 03-JGK, 291 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK) MOTION in Limine 1.Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiffs from Offering Evidence that Has Not Been Produced and Evidence Whose Relevance is Unsupported by Evidence that Has Been Produced.. filed by Eli V erschleiser, (415 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 320 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK) MOTION in Limine Preclude Plaintiff from Offering Evidence as to Speculative Losses. filed by Eli Verschleiser. For the reasons set out above, the plaintiffs' motio n to strike the defendants' witness list is denied. The defendants' motions in limine are denied in part and granted in part as explained above. The Clerk is directed to close all pending motions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/3/2019) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK(ks)
|
|
Filing
366
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: (212 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK-JLC) MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Albert Akerman. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the motion for summary judgment by defendant Akerman is granted. All claims against defendant Akerman are dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to close Dkt. No. 212 in 14-cv-8084. SO ORDERED., (Albert Akerman and Albert Akerman terminated.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/2/17) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK-JLC, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK-JLC(yv)
|
|
Filing
294
MEMORANDUM OPINION ANDORDER re: (182 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK-JLC) LETTER MOTION for Discovery to Strike Plaintiffs' Expert Reports and to Preclude their Testimony in this Action. addressed to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott from Joshua S ummers, Esq. dated January 17, 2017. filed by Multi Capital Group of Companies, L.L.C., Eli Verschleiser. Pending before the Court are the plaintiffs' objections to Magistrate Judge Cott's January 18, 2017 Order (the "Order") striking two expert reports because they were filed after the court-ordered deadline for expert disclosure. (As further set forth in this Order.) The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addr essed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. The objections are overruled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close all open motions. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/25/2017) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK-JLC, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK-JLC(cf)
|
|
Filing
126
OPINION AND ORDER. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the motion to abstain is denied. The motion t o dismiss the Complaint brought by Verschleiser, Multi Group, Delforno, Pinhasi, and Onica is denied in part and granted in part; and the motion to dismiss brought by Wright is granted. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 100 in Case No. 14cv08 084 and Docket Nos. 86 and 105 in Case No. 14cv05903. So ordered. re: (105 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK) MOTION to Dismiss filed by David O. Wright, (86 in 1:14-cv-05903-JGK) MOTION to Dismiss filed by Raul Delforno, Ophir Pinhasi, Multi Capital Group of Companies, L.L.C., Alexandru Onica, Eli Verschleiser, Ophir Parnasi, (100 in 1:14-cv-08084-JGK) MOTION to Dismiss filed by David O. Wright. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/22/2016) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-JGK, 1:14-cv-08084-JGK (rjm)
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, they are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' application for sanctions in connection with the temporary restraining order application is denied. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/3/2015) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
