Argueta-Anariba v. Recktenwald
Petitioner: Angel Argueta-Anariba
Respondent: Monica Recktenwald
Case Number: 1:2014cv07847
Filed: September 26, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Orange
Presiding Judge: Lorna G. Schofield
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons herein, the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to the pro se Petitioner and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 11/4/2014) (kgo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Argueta-Anariba v. Recktenwald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Angel Argueta-Anariba
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Monica Recktenwald
Represented By: Peter Max Aronoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?