King v. USA

King v. USA

Plaintiff:	Melissa G. King
Defendant:	USA
Case Number:	1:2014cv07962
Filed:	September 30, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 25, 2017	Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the petitioner's motion p ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the Petition and closing this case. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/25/2017) (ap)
September 6, 2016	Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Michael Schachter, Michael Handwerker, and Alice Fontier are directed to provide affidavits setting forth any factual information in response to the petitioner's allegations. The affidavits should be submitted by September 30, 2016. Ms. King may submit any response by October 21, 2016. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/6/2016) (tn)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 25, 2017

Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the petitioner's motion p ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the Petition and closing this case. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/25/2017) (ap)

September 6, 2016

Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Michael Schachter, Michael Handwerker, and Alice Fontier are directed to provide affidavits setting forth any factual information in response to the petitioner's allegations. The affidavits should be submitted by September 30, 2016. Ms. King may submit any response by October 21, 2016. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/6/2016) (tn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By:	Jennifer Lane Gachiri
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa G. King
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?