Sales v. TWU Local 100 Vice President Brain Clark et al
| Lavien Sales |
| TWU Local 100 Vice President Brain Clark, Local 100 Division Chariman Richard Davis, Ken Piage, Ed Pichardo and Dwayne Ruffin |
| 1:2014cv08091 |
| October 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Paul A. Crotty |
| Michael H. Dolinger |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 124 Report and Recommendations. The defendants' motions to dismiss are granted. Because the Court determines that further amendment would be futile, the amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Dkt. 71 and 103, enter judgment, and close this case. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 3/6/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (kgo) Modified on 3/6/2017 (kgo).
|
|
Filing
92
OPINION AND ORDER re: (14 in 1:15-cv-08689-PAC-SN, 90 in 1:14-cv-08091-PAC-SN) MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Lavien Sales. Accordingly, the Court denies Saless application without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the m otions at ECF No. 90 in 14 Civ. 08091 and ECF No. 14 in 15 Civ. 08689. The Court also reminds Sales that pursuant to its June 14, 2016 order, all remaining claims have been consolidated under the 2014 case. All future submissions should be filed only to the docket for 14 Civ. 08091. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 9/16/2016) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-08091-PAC-SN, 1:15-cv-08689-PAC-SN Copies Mailed By Chambers. (cla)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for (61 in 1:14-cv-08091-PAC-SN, 7 in 1:15-cv-08689-PAC-SN) Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Netburn's June 14, 2016 R&R in full, insofar as the R&R's rec ommendations are not rendered moot by Sales's withdrawal of his discrimination claims. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Case No. 15 Civ. 8689. The reference to Magistrate Judge Netburn is continued. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 8/4/2016) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-08091-PAC-SN, 1:15-cv-08689-PAC-SN Copies Mailed By Chambers. (kko)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 29 Report and Recommendations re: 15 Motion to Dismiss filed by Ed Pichardo, Ken Piage, Local 100 Division Chariman Richard Davis, TWU Local 100 Vice President Brain Clark, Dwayne Ru ffin. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger (Dkt. 5), and defendants moved to dismiss. (Dkt. 15.) On September 9, 2015, Magistrate Judge Dolinger issued a report and recommendation (R&R) recommending that the Court di smiss Sales's complaint, with leave to amend. (Dkt. 29.) The R&R noted the process and timeline for objecting to the R&R. (Id. at 22.) Here, Sales has filed no objections to Magistrate Judge Dolinger's R&R. Reviewing for plain e rror, the Court finds no error in Magistrate Judge Dolinger's R&R and accordingly adopts its findings as its own. Sales's Complaint (Dkt. 1) is DISMISSED with leave to amend. The Court construes Sales's Reply to 10-5-2015 Order & Complaint (Dkt. 34) as his amended complaint. The reference to Magistrate Judge Netburn is continued. (As further set forth in this Order Adopting Report and Recommendation.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 11/30/2015) Copies Mailed by Chambers.(mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
