Crown Awards, Inc. v. Trophy Depot, Inc. et al
| Crown Awards, Inc. |
| Trophy Depot, Inc., James O'Boyle and Howard Becker |
| 1:2015cv01178 |
| February 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Westchester |
| Lewis A. Kaplan |
| Copyright |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 87 Motion for Sanctions ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 87 Motion for Sanctions filed by Howard Becker, James O'Boyle, Trophy Depot, Inc., 128 Report and Recommendations. ENDORSEMENT: Defendants' objections to the report and recommendation of Magistrate JudgeAndrew J. Peck (the "R&R"), which recommends denial of plaintiff's motion for sanctions [DI 87],are overruled and the motion is denied. The Court finds no clear error, and the recommendation isnot contrary to law. In any case, the Court would deny the motion in the exercise of discretion.This is not to condone what Judge Peck described as admissions and "clear andconvincing evidence of intentional falsehoods by C rown's witnesses." R&R at 23. The UnitedStates Attorney should consider whether criminal charges are appropriate, as perjury in civil casesshould not be tolerated any more than perjury before grand juries and in criminal trials. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 7/14/2017) (jwh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
