Cornelius v. Cuomo
Petitioner: Austin Cornelius
Respondent: Andrew Cuomo
Case Number: 1:2015cv01644
Filed: March 4, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Wyoming
Presiding Judge: Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER. Petitioner's arguments are without merit. The Court has reviewed the portions of the Report not objected to and finds no clear error. The Petition is accordingly denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/18/2016) (rjm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cornelius v. Cuomo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Austin Cornelius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Andrew Cuomo
Represented By: Thomas Benjamin Litsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?