Beckert v. Rubinov et al
| Alfonso Beckert |
| Roni Rubinov, Alex Rubinov and New Liberty Pawn Shop Inc. |
| 1:2015cv01951 |
| March 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court approves the $45,000 settlement. Beckert's counsel is to receive $15,294.69, and the balance is to go to Beckert. The action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/14/2015) (kl)
|
|
Filing
25
OPINION & ORDER: The Court therefore declines, at this time, to approve the Agreement or find it to be fair and reasonable. The parties may proceed in one of the three following ways: The parties may file a revised agreement by November 6, 20 15, that addresses the concerns expressed in this order. The parties also shall file a joint letter that (1) describes the bona tides of the dispute and identifies and explains the amount that plaintiff could receive if he prevails at trial, and ( 2) explains why the settlement amount and the portion of the settlement allocated to attorneys' fees are fair and reasonable. Plaintiff's counsel also shall submit contemporaneous time records, and information regarding the hourly rate for all attorneys and support staff who have worked on this case; or The parties may file a joint letter by November 6, 2015, indicating their intention to abandon the settlement and to continue litigating this matter. If they do so, the Court intends to lift the stay of discovery, see Dkt. 23, and to set a prompt date for the next conference in this case; or The parties may stipulate to a dismissal of this case without prejudice, as such settlements do not require Court approv al. See Cheeks, 796 F.3d at 201 n.2 (leaving for another day the question of whether district court or Department of Labor approval is required for dismissals without prejudice). (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/27/2015) (kl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
