Morea v. McHugh

Morea v. McHugh

Plaintiff:	Nancy Morea
Defendant:	John McHugh
Case Number:	1:2015cv02720
Filed:	April 8, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Queens
Presiding Judge:	Paul A. Engelmayer
Nature of Suit:	Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 701
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 4, 2017	Filing 43 OPINION & ORDER: re: 32 MOTION for Judgment as to the Complaint's First Cause of Action for Discrimination. filed by Eric K. Fanning. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants defendant's motion for partial summary judgme nt, limited to Morea's discrimination claim under the Rehabilitation Act. The Court respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to close the motion pending at docket number 32. The case will now proceed to trial on Morea's surviving claim fo r retaliation. The Court directs the parties to submit a joint pretrial order, consistent with the Court's individual rules, within four weeks of this order, i.e., by September 1, 2017. Any motions in limine are to be filed along with the joi nt pretrial order. Oppositions to such motions are due one week later, i.e., by September 8, 2017. After receiving the joint pretrial order, the Court will schedule a pretrial conference and a trial date. ( Motions due by 9/1/2017., Pretrial Order due by 9/1/2017., Responses due by 9/8/2017) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 8/4/2017) (rj)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 4, 2017

Filing 43 OPINION & ORDER: re: 32 MOTION for Judgment as to the Complaint's First Cause of Action for Discrimination. filed by Eric K. Fanning. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants defendant's motion for partial summary judgme nt, limited to Morea's discrimination claim under the Rehabilitation Act. The Court respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to close the motion pending at docket number 32. The case will now proceed to trial on Morea's surviving claim fo r retaliation. The Court directs the parties to submit a joint pretrial order, consistent with the Court's individual rules, within four weeks of this order, i.e., by September 1, 2017. Any motions in limine are to be filed along with the joi nt pretrial order. Oppositions to such motions are due one week later, i.e., by September 8, 2017. After receiving the joint pretrial order, the Court will schedule a pretrial conference and a trial date. ( Motions due by 9/1/2017., Pretrial Order due by 9/1/2017., Responses due by 9/8/2017) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 8/4/2017) (rj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morea v. McHugh
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Morea
Represented By:	Jesse Curtis Rose
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: John McHugh
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?