Bahamonte v. Connolly

Bahamonte v. Connolly

Petitioner:	Richard Bahamonte
Respondent:	William Connolly
Case Number:	1:2015cv03878
Filed:	May 12, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Dutchess
Presiding Judge:	Richard J. Sullivan
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 3, 2017	Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the reasons set forth above and in Judge Eilis's Report, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Petition is DENIED. In addition, because Petitioner has not "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see also Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). Furthermore, because any appeal would "lack[] an arguable basi s in law or fact." Tavarez v. Reno, 54 F.3d 109, 110 (2d Cir. 1995), the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be unde1taken in good faith, and, therefore, Petitioner may not proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to (1) enter judgment in favor of Respondent and close this case, and (2) mail a copy of this Order to Petitioner. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 8/3/2017) (js)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 3, 2017

Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the reasons set forth above and in Judge Eilis's Report, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Petition is DENIED. In addition, because Petitioner has not "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see also Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). Furthermore, because any appeal would "lack[] an arguable basi s in law or fact." Tavarez v. Reno, 54 F.3d 109, 110 (2d Cir. 1995), the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be unde1taken in good faith, and, therefore, Petitioner may not proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to (1) enter judgment in favor of Respondent and close this case, and (2) mail a copy of this Order to Petitioner. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 8/3/2017) (js)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bahamonte v. Connolly
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Bahamonte
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: William Connolly
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?