A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan v. Actavis, plc et al
| A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan |
| Actavis, plc, Forest Laboratories, LLC, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH & Co. KGaA, Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd., Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Cobalt Laboratories, Inc., Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc., Wockhardt Limited, Wockhardt USA LLC, Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc. |
| 1:2015cv04406 |
| June 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Antitrust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING USE OF EVIDENCE FROM OTHER ACTIONS: NOW, THEREFORE, Allergan plc, and Forest Laboratories, LLC, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Merz GmbH & Co. KGaA, and Merz Pharma GmbH & Co. KGaA ("Forest and Merz Defendants" ), and MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC and MSPA Claims 1, LLC ("MSP") hereby stipulate by and between the Parties through their respective counsel, as follows: 1) The following categories of evidence from The People of the State of New Yo rk v. Actavis, et al., Case No. 14-cv-7473 (S.D.N.Y.) (the "NYAG Action"), In re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 15-cv-07488-CM (S.D.N.Y.) (the "DPP Action"), and already taken in the IPP Action are deeme d to be, and shall be treated as if they were, submitted or taken in this case: as further set forth in this Order. 2) The Parties agree that they will not object to the admissibility of deposition, hearing, or investigational testimony and all oth er evidence referenced in section (1) above on the grounds that it otherwise would violate Federal Rule of Evidence 802 or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32, except that the Parties reserve the right to object to testimony on the ground that the te stimony offered constitutes hearsay within hearsay. The Parties otherwise reserve all rights to object on other grounds to the relevance and/or admissibility of any evidence referenced in section (1) above. 3) The Parties reserve the right to cross-e xamine during depositions, hearings and at trial any witness on any topic addressed on direct examination. 4) The Parties reserve all rights to call any witness who testified in the NYAG Action, DPP Action, or the IPP Action to testify live at any trial in this case. 5) This agreement is limited to use in this action and only for the purposes of establishing the evidentiary record. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 1/30/2020) (mml)
|
|
Filing
64
MEMO ENDORSED NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AS COUNSEL OF RECORD in case 1:15-cv-06549-CM-RWL; granting (55) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 1:19-cv-10184-CM. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 1/9/2020) (mml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
