Douglas et al v. Spartan Demolition Company LLC et al
Shreal Douglas, Eric Dupree, Shaheem Jones, Michael Bautista and Joe Smith |
Spartan Demolition Company LLC, Marc Alleyne and AJS Construction & Renovation Inc. |
1:2015cv05126 |
June 30, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Bronx |
Andrew L. Carter |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 OPINION AND ORDER re: 65 MOTION for Default Judgment as to ALL DEFENDANTS filed by Shaheem Jones, Joe Smith, Eric Dupree, Shreal Douglas, Michael Bautista. Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs are awar ded judgment against the AJS Defendants, jointly and severally, as follows: (1) $10,426.88 to Douglas; (2) $13,186.88 to Smith; (3) $10,426.88 to Bautista; (4) $7,820.16 to Dupree; (5) $4,902.40 to Jones and (6) $71,5 37.15 in attorneys' fees and costs. Thus, in total, plaintiffs are entitled to a judgment of $118,300.35. Plaintiffs' counsel is directed to submit a proposed judgment. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 9/20/2018) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (mro) |
Filing 62 OPINION AND ORDER re: 56 MOTION to Approve FLSA Settlement Agreement. The application of plaintiffs, AJS and C&R for approval of their proposed settlement agreement is denied without prejudice to renewal. Any renewed application for approval of th e settlement should either include a revised allocation of the settlement proceeds or provide a reasonable explanation of the rationale for the allocation of the proceeds among the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs' counsel is directed to provide a copy of this Order to A.J.S. Project Management, Inc. and AJS Construction & Renovation Inc., and as further set forth herein. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 10/19/2017) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (ras) |
Filing 57 OPINION AND ORDER re: 56 MOTION to Approve FLSA Settlement Agreement , filed by A.J.S. Project Management, Inc., AJS Construction & Renovation Inc.The application of plaintiffs, AJS and C&R for approval of their proposed settlemen t agreement is denied without prejudice to renewal. Any renewed application for approval of the settlement should explain the rationale for the allocation of the proceeds among the plaintiffs and should eliminate the "no-assistance" provision discussed in the preceding paragraph, and as further set forth. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 7/7/2017) Copies transmitted by Chambers. (ras) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.