Roelcke v. ZiP Aviation, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Katharina Roelcke
Defendant: ZiP Aviation, LLC, Manhattan Helicopter Services LLC and Itai Shoshani
Case Number: 1:2015cv06284
Filed: August 10, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Deborah A. Batts
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 153 ORDER: It having been reported to this Court that the parties have settled this action, it is, on this 13th day of July, 2022, hereby ordered that this matter be discontinued with prejudice but without costs; provided, however, that within 30 days of the date of this order, counsel for the plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored. Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreem ent to the Court within the same thirty-day period to be so-ordered by the Court. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. All pending motions are dismissed as moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 7/13/2022) (ks)
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 151 ORDER: This case has been pending for almost seven years. The proposal to take three months to file necessary papers in preparation for trial (ECF No. 150) is unreasonable. Therefore, the Court adopts the following schedule: The joint pre-trial ord er, requests to charge, voir dire requests, and motions in limine are due by July 29, 2022. Responses and objections are due by August 12, 2022. Ready trial, 48 hours' notice, September 9, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/27/2022) ( Motions due by 7/29/2022., Pretrial Order due by 7/29/2022., Responses due by 8/12/2022, Ready for Trial by 9/9/2022.) (ks)
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 140 OPINION AND ORDER re: 131 AMENDED MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Katharina Roelcke, 102 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Manhattan Helicopters LLC, Itai Shoshani, ZiP Aviation, LLC. The Court has consider ed all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not discussed above, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied. The Clerk is directed to close Docket Nos. 102 and 131. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/23/2021) (mml)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 137 ORDER granting 132 Motion to Seal. Application granted. So Ordered.. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/21/2021) (ks)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER granting 101 Letter Motion to Seal. Application granted. Exhibits 18 and 22 should be filed under seal. The memorandum of law, declaration, and Rule 56.1 statement should be redacted only to the extent that they refer to the confidential portions of Exhibits 18 and 22. So ordered.. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/9/2021) (ks)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER: A pre-motion conference is scheduled for January 20, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. Dial-in: 888 363-4749, with access code 8140049. The parties should submit a joint pre-conference letter by January 15, 2021. Cross-motions for summary judgment are due February 5, 2021. Opposition papers are due March 5, 2021. Reply papers are due March 19, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/7/2021) ( Telephone Conference set for 1/20/2021 at 02:30 PM before Judge John G. Koeltl.) (ks)
August 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER denying as moot 73 Letter Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 78 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. The Court held a conference in this case yesterday. As discussed, the discovery deadlines are modified as follows: P laintiff must complete document production by August 31. If plaintiff fails to meet this deadline, defendants may move for sanctions and other relief as appropriate, including preclusion of documents produced after the August 31 deadline. Fact discov ery must be completed by November 20. As for expert discovery, plaintiff's expert reports, if any, are due by November 13, defendants' expert reports, if any, are due by December 7, and all expert discovery, including expert depositions, mu st be completed by December 21. These deadlines will not be extended. The Court will hold a status conference on January 6, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. to discuss whether the parties wish to seek the Court's assistance in settlement negotiations at that time and to schedule anticipated motion practice, if any. Unless the Court provides otherwise, counsel should plan to attend this conference by telephone at the same number used for yesterday's conference. The Clerk is directed to close docket numbers 73 and 78 and mark docket number 73 as denied as moot and docket number 78 as granted in part and denied in part. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 8/27/2020) (mml)
August 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cott for general pretrial matters. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 8/4/2020) (jca)
March 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 72 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING THE EXCHANGE AND PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...DONE and ORDERED on March 31, 2020. This Order is not binding on the Court or Court personnel. The Court reserves the right to amend the Order at any time. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/31/2020) (ks)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roelcke v. ZiP Aviation, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katharina Roelcke
Represented By: Derek Todd Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ZiP Aviation, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manhattan Helicopter Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Itai Shoshani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?