Ford v. Bloomberg et al
| Samuel Ford |
| Michael Bloomberg, City of New York Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Thomas R. Frieden, M.D, Dora Shriro, John/Jane Doe Corizon Health Service Manager, Jane Doe Corizon Health Service Manager (MDC), African MD John Doe (MDC), African MD John Doe AMKC Rikers Island and City of New York |
| 1:2015cv07598 |
| September 25, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of New York Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, City of New York. Before the Court is the August 29, 2016 Report and Recommendation of the Han. James C. Francis, United S tates Magistrate Judge, recommending that the Court dismiss this action with prejudice. Dkt. 23 ("Report"). For the following reasons, the Court adopts this recommendation. For the foregoing reasons, the Court dismisses Ford's Complain t with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. The Court directs the Clerk to mail a copy of this decision to plaintiff at the address on file. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 9/15/2016) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
