Berrio v. City Of New York et al
Michelle Berrio |
City Of New York and John and/or Jane Does |
1:2015cv09570 |
December 8, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Andrew L. Carter |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER re: 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City Of New York: For the reasons set forth above, the City's motion to dismiss the Complaint is granted in part and denied in part as follows: Plaintiff's causes of action under the Equal Protection Clause and for malicious prosecution, excessive use of force, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, and negligent infliction of emotional distress are dismissed without prejudice except as identified above. Plaintiff's causes of action for defamation, slander per se, and negligent hiring, training, and supervision are dismissed in part. Plaintiff's common law cause of action for false imprisonment and related claim s under the United States and New York State constitutions are not dismissed. The Court will hold a status conference in this matter on January 30, 2017, at 10:15 a.m. The parties (and/or counsel) should appear in person in Courtroom 1306 at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY, on the date and time specified above. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 1/9/2017) (tn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.