In Re:Application of XPO Logistics, Inc
Respondent: Elliott Capital Advisors, L.P., Elliott Management Corporation and Elliott Associates, L.P.
Case Number: 1:2015mc00205
Filed: July 10, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Lorna G. Schofield
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 160 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, the May 22, 2017, Order is AFFIRMED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 12/11/2017) (jcs)
May 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 143 OPINION & ORDER: re: granting in party and denying in part 128 MOTION to Reopen re: Telephone Conference, 41 Order on Motion for Discovery 23 Memo Endorsement RESPONDENTS' NOTICE OF MOTION TO RENEW THEIR APPLICATION TO ENFORCE DISCOVERY ORDERS A ND TO COMPEL PETITIONER TO OBEY THE CO MOTION to Compel Petitioner XPO Logistics, Inc. to produce ALL RESPONSIVE NON-PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS, filed by Elliott Associates, L.P., Elliott Capital Advisors, L.P., Elliott Management Corporation, granting in part and denying in part 133 CROSS MOTION to Compel Elliott to Produce Documents, filed by Application of XPO Logistics, Inc. Elliott's application for discovery pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. XPO, XPO G F, and Jacobson shall produce responsive, non-privileged documents as described in this Opinion and Order by Monday, June 5, 2017, and as further set forth in this order. Motions terminated: 128 MOTION to Reopen and 133 CROSS MOTION to Compel Elliott to Produce Documents, filed by Application of XPO Logistics, Inc. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 5/22/2017) (ap)
June 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER AND OPINION. Because the Objection was untimely filed, and because the Discovery Order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law, Elliott's objection is OVERRULED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 6/22/2016) (rjm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re:Application of XPO Logistics, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Elliott Capital Advisors, L.P.
Represented By: Joshua Kallman Bromberg
Represented By: David Parker
Represented By: Robert F. Serio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Elliott Management Corporation
Represented By: Joshua Kallman Bromberg
Represented By: David Parker
Represented By: Robert F. Serio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Elliott Associates, L.P.
Represented By: Joshua Kallman Bromberg
Represented By: David Parker
Represented By: Robert F. Serio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?