Nguedi v. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York
||The Federal Reserve Bank of New York
||January 27, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||Loretta A. Preska
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 2000
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 7, 2019
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 89 MOTION for Summary Judgment On All Remaining Claims filed by The Federal Reserve Bank of New York. For the reasons state above, Defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment for Defendant, and to terminate this case. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail this opinion and order to Plaintiff, by certified mail, at both the address listed on the docket, and the add ress referenced in the Court's July 26, 2018 order. (ECF No. 107). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/7/2019) (anc) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|December 1, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 56 MOTION to Dismiss the Fifth Amended Complaint filed by The Federal Reserve Bank of New York. For the reasons stated above, the New York Fed's motion to dismiss is granted in part and denie d in part. Plaintiff's Title VII discrimination claim, NYSHRL discrimination claim, and NYCHRL claim, to the extent the NYCHRL claim is based on Crouch's conduct, survive. Plaintiff's Title VII hostile work environment claim, NYCHR L claim premised on the cafeteria worker's and ID clerk's conduct, and claims against the NYPD and Mr. Bratton are dismissed. The Court does not grant Plaintiff leave to amend his complaint with respect to the dismissed claims, as Plain tiff has already had two opportunities to cure deficiencies raised in his previous pleading. See Rutolo v. City of New York, 514 F.3d 184, 191 (2d Cir. 2008) ("Leave to amend, though liberally granted, may properly be denied for... repeated f ailure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed...."). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal by Plaintiff from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status i s denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Court requests that counsel for Defendant provide Plaintiff with copies of unpublished cases cited in this decision pursuant to Local Rule of t he United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York 7.2. The Clerk of Court is instructed to terminate the motion pending at docket number 56 and to mail Plaintiff a copy of this order by certified mail and by regular, first-class mail. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 12/1/2017) (anc)
|June 12, 2017
OPINION AND ORDER re: 45 MOTION to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint, filed by The Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend his complaint, solely with respect to those claims that were not dismi ssed with prejudice, to correct the deficiencies identified in this opinion. Any amended complaint must be filed no later than 30 days after the date of this order. If Plaintiff fails to file a fifth amended complaint within that time, this action will be dismissed and judgment will enter. Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED in its entirety. Plaintiff's claims under Title VII, the NYSHRL, and the NYCHRL are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's claims for false arr est under are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at ECF No. 45. The Court will mail a copy of this opinion and order to Plaintiff, along with all unreported decisions cited herein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/11/17) (yv) Modified on 6/12/2017 (yv).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?