U.S. Bank National Association, et al v. BFPRU I, LLC et al
| U.S. Bank National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| BFPRU I, LLC, Mark Karasick and Michael Silberberg |
| 1:2016cv01450 |
| February 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
OPINION AND ORDER re: 32 MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Motion to Dismiss the Third Party Complaint. filed by LNR Partners, LLC, 35 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Mark Karasick, BFPRU I, LLC, Michael Silberberg. The defen dants move to dismiss the plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. LNR moves to dismiss the defendants' third party complaint. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the reasons s et forth above, the defendants' motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is denied. The third party defendant's motion to dismiss the third party complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is granted. The remaining arguments of the parties are either moot or without merit. The clerk is directed to close all pending motions. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/28/2017) (cf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
