Aquino v. City Of New York et al
| Ramfis Aquino |
| City Of New York, Francisco Medina, Anthony Robinson and David Cruz |
| 1:2016cv01577 |
| March 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Gregory H. Woods |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 82 MOTION to Bifurcate Plaintiff's Monell Claims, filed by Anthony Robinson, City Of New York, David Cruz, Francisco Medina. Defendants' motion for bifurcation is GRANTED. The stay of di scovery on Plaintiff's Monell claim entered by the Court on April 25, 2017 (Dkt. No. 85) remains in full force and effect pending trial of Plaintiff's underlying constitutional claim. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 82. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 5/19/17) (yv)
|
|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 51 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Monell Claims. filed by Anthony Robinson, City Of New York, David Cruz, Francisco Medina. For the reasons stated above, the City's motion to dismiss P laintiff's Monell claim is granted, and Plaintiff's Monell claim is dismissed without prejudice to filing a second amended complaint no later than 30 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 51. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 1/25/2017) (kgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
