Edrei et al v. Bratton et al
| Anika Edrei, Shay Horse, James Craven, Keegan Stephan and Michael Nusbaum |
| William Bratton, The City Of New York ,, John Doe #1 Maguire and John Doe #2 |
| 1:2016cv01652 |
| March 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
ORDER OF DISMISSAL... It is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is no t consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, requests to extend the deadline to reopen are unlikely to b e granted. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(B) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/14/21) (yv)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER SCHEDULING CONTINUED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Judge Moses will conduct a continued settlement conference on April 20, 2021, at 2:15 p.m. No later than April 13, 2021, the parties shall submit a joint confidential settlement letter no longer th an three pages single-spaced to Moses_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. (As further set forth in this Order.) ( Settlement Conference set for 4/20/2021 at 02:15 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 3/15/2021) (cf)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER OF DISMISSAL... It is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, requests to extend the deadline to reopen are unlikely to be granted. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be "so ordered" by the Court . Per Paragraph 4(B) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/12/21) (yv)
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER: granting 130 Letter Motion to Stay. Application GRANTED. To facilitate settlement discussions, the stay is extended to January 25, 2021. The parties shall advise the Court immediately in the event of a settlement and, in any event, shall submit a status letter no later than January 25, 2021. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 130. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/27/2020) (ama)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER granting 128 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED. The settlement conference currently scheduled for October 20, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. is hereby ADJOURNED to January 11, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall submit their jo int confidential settlement letter, as directed in the Court's August 19 Order Continuing Settlement Conference (Dkt. No. 123) no later than January 4, 2021. Settlement Conference set for 1/11/2021 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 10/16/2020) (cf)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER granting 126 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED. The settlement conference currently scheduled for September 29, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. is hereby ADJOURNED to October 20, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall submit thei r joint confidential settlement letter, as directed in the Court's August 19 Order Continuing Settlement Conference (Dkt. No. 123), no later than October 13, 2020. Settlement Conference set for 10/20/2020 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 9/22/2020) (cf)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER granting 124 Letter Motion to Stay. Applications GRANTED. To facilitate settlement discussions, the stay is extended to October 27, 2020, and the pretrial conference is ADJOURNED sine die. The parties shall advise the Court immediately in the event of a settlement and, in any event, shall submit a status letter no later than October 27, 2020. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 124. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 8/20/20) (yv)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Judge Moses will conduct a continued settlement conference on September 29, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. (As further set forth in this Order.) The parties shall coordinate the videoconference technology to be used dur ing the conference and send the link to Judge Moses's chambers upon submission of their joint letter. (Telephone Conference set for 9/29/2020 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 8/19/2020) (cf)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: A settlement conference is scheduled before Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses on August 18, 2020, at 2:15 p.m. (As further set forth in this Order.) ( Settlement Conference set for 8/18/2020 at 02:15 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 7/15/2020) (cf)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER terminating 102 Letter Motion for Conference ; granting 113 Letter Motion to Stay. Application GRANTED. The Court is of the view that this case can and should settle. Accordingly, to encourage the parties' settlement efforts, th e stay is hereby EXTENDED to August 28, 2020. Future extension requests, however, will likely be denied. In light of the extension and the parties' focus on settlement, the Court exercises its discretion to deny the pending discovery-related motion without prejudice to renewal by August 14, 2020. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF Nos. 102 and 113. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/29/2020) (ks)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER granting 111 Letter Motion to Stay. Application GRANTED. The case is stay for 90 days and the pretrial conference is ADJOURNED to September 29, 2020, at 3:00 p.m. Plaintiffs shall file their amended pleadings within 30 days of the stay be ing lifted. Within 90 days of the date of this order, the parties shall submit a joint status letter addressing whether they are prepared to proceed and whether they believe any further changes to the schedule are necessary. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 111. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 3/31/20) (yv)
|
|
Filing
101
RULE 502(d) ORDER granting 100 Letter Motion for Discovery. The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, electronically stored information ("ESI") or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver o f the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). Nothing contained herein is intend ed to or shall serve to limit a party's right to conduct a review of documents, ESI or information (including metadata) for relevance, responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before production. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 100. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 2/26/20) (yv)
|
|
Filing
66
OPINION re: 58 LETTER MOTION: Defendants John Maguire ("Maguire"), Mike Poletto ("Poletto" and, together with Maguire, the "Officers"), and the City of New York ("NYC" and, collectively with the Officers, the "Defendants") have moved to stay proceedings before the Court as to the remaining claims brought by Plaintiffs Anika Edrei ("Edrei"), Shay Horse ("Horse"), James Craven ("Craven"), Keegan Stephan ("Stepha n"), Michael Nusbaum ("Nusbaum"), and Alexander Appel ("Appel") (collectively, the "Plaintiffs") pending the outcome of Defendants' interlocutory appeal on the issue of the Officers' qualified immunity defense. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to stay proceedings as to Plaintiffs' claims pending resolution of their appeal is granted. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 8/31/2017) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
53
OPINION re: 35 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Mike Poletto, The City Of New York, William Bratton, John Maguire. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted with regards to Counts Two, Three, Six, Seven, Eight, and Nine, and denied with regards to Counts One, Four, and Five. It is so ordered. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 5/31/2017) (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
