Brady v. Associated Press Telecom et al
| James H. Brady |
| Associated Press Telecom, NBC News New York, WCBS-TV New York, The New York Times Company, The New York Post, New York Daily News, The Wall Street Journal, Newsday Media Group and John Doe 1-50 |
| 1:2016cv02693 |
| April 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| George B. Daniels |
| Kevin Nathaniel Fox |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Fox's Report and Recommendation, this Court overrules Plaintiff's objections and adopts the Report in full. Defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED with prejudice. Plai ntiff is denied leave to amend, as amendment would be futile. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motions at ECF Nos. 9, 19, and 22. So ordered. Re 62 Report and Recommendation, 22 Motion to Dismiss filed by NBC News New York, 9 Motion to Dismiss filed by The New York Times Company, 19 Motion to Dismiss filed by The Wall Street Journal, New York Daily News, Newsday Media Group, WCBS-TV New York, Associated Press Telecom. New York Daily News, Newsday Media Group, The New York Times Company, The Wall Street Journal, WCBS-TV New York, Associated Press Telecom and NBC News New York terminated. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 1/11/2017) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
