Uppal v. NYS Department of Health et al
Plaintiff: Neelam Uppal
Defendant: NYS Department of Health, Florida Departmentof Health and Florida Board of Medicine
Case Number: 1:2016cv03038
Filed: April 25, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Vernon S. Broderick
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER: Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall submit a letter of no more than three (3) pages demonstrating good cause as to why this case should not be dismissed p ursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). "Good cause is generally found only in exceptional circumstances where the plaintiff's failure to serve process in a timely manner was the result of circumstances beyond its control.&quo t; E. Refractories Co. v. Forty Eight Insulations, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 503, 505 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (internal quotation marks omitted). "District courts consider the diligence of plaintiff's efforts to effect proper service and any prejudic e suffered by the defendant as a consequence of the delay." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). "An attorney's inadvertence, neglect, mistake or misplaced reliance does not constitute good cause." Howard v. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler, 977 F. Supp. 654, 658 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) (citing McGregor v. United States, 933 F.2d 156, 160 (2d Cir. 1991), aff'd, 173 F.3d 844 (2d Cir. 1999)). Plaintiff is warned that failure to submit a letter and to demonstrate good cause for failure to serve Defendants within ninety days after the complaint was filed will result in dismissal of this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 6/16/2020) (rro)
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 63 OPINION & ORDER re: 38 MOTION to Dismiss complaint. filed by Timothy Maher, NYS Department of Health. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, (Doc. 38), is GRANTED and Plaintiff' ;s claims against NYSDOH, Mahar, Wilson, Grabiec, Koenig, D'Anna, and Milone are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. An Order of Service as to the remaining Defendants, the Florida Department of Health and Carlton Fields Law Firm, will be entered concurre ntly with this Opinion & Order.The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Document 38, and to mail a copy of this Opinion & Order to the pro se Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Peter S. Koenig, Sr, Timothy Maher (Attorney, Legal Affiairs Department, NYS Department of Health), Richard D. Milone, NYS Department of Health, Linda Prescott Wilson, John A. D'Anna and Steven Grabiec terminated.) (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 9/27/2019) (rro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Uppal v. NYS Department of Health et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neelam Uppal
Represented By: Rudy Artin Dermesropian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NYS Department of Health
Represented By: James M. Hershler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Florida Departmentof Health
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Florida Board of Medicine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?