Forde et al v. Hornblower New York, LLC
Crystal Forde and Taleisha Charles |
Hornblower New York, LLC, Hornblower Yachts, LLC and Rafaella D. Maranhao |
1:2016cv04028 |
May 31, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Alison J. Nathan |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 7 Motion to Remand to State Court. This Court joins the majority of district courts in concluding that the savings to suitor clause continues to bar the removal of admiralty claims absent an independen t basis for federal court jurisdiction, even in the wake of the 2011 amendment to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Because no separate basis of jurisdiction exists in this case, the Court hereby remands Plaintiffs Forde and Charles' case to the New York Supreme Court, County of New York. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c); Olsen, 130 F. Supp. 3d at 763. Additionally, the Court declines to exercise its discretion over Intervenor Figueroa's complaint, and it dismisses that complaint without pr ejudice. This resolves Docket Number 7. The Clerk of the Court is directed remand Plaintiffs' Forde and Charles' complaint to state court and then close the case. (As further set forth in this Memorandum & Order.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/20/2017) (mro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.