Pincaro et al v. Glassdoor, Inc.
Plaintiff: Paulo Pincaro, Melissa Nau and Timothy L. Keiser
Defendant: Glassdoor, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2016cv06870
Filed: August 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 2707
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 15 MOTION to Compel Arbitration or, in the alternative MOTION to Transfer Case to the Northern District of California filed by Glassdoor, Inc. :Defendant Glassdoor, Inc. ("Glassdoor") operates a website that provides a database ofcompany reviews, ratings, salary and benefits information, and job listings. Declaration of TomO'Brien ("O'Brien Decl.") (Doc. 16) 3. Plaintiffs Melissa Nau ("Nau") and Pau lo Pincaro("Pincaro") (together, "Plaintiffs) are suing Glassdoor on behalf of themselves and otherssimilarly situated for violations of the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2702, 2707, aswell as violations of New York State law. Complaint ("Cmpl.") (Doc. 1) 2. Plaintiffs allegethat Glassdoor publically exposed the email addresses of at least 600,000 of its members,violating their privacy rights and its own policies. Id. 6. Plaintiff contends that conf identialityis essential to Glassdoor's members, who share negative opinions of their current or formeremployers and would be susceptible to possible retaliation. Id. 20. Glassdoor moves tocompel arbitration and stay the case pending completion of arbitration, contending that thePlaintiffs agreed to a mandatory arbitration provision in the company's terms of use. Doc. 15.2For the reasons outlined below, Glassdoor's motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED.For the reasons set forth above, Glassdoor's motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED. The parties are instructed to advise the Court within 48 hours of the outcome of the arbitration. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to stay this action pending arbitration and terminate the motion, Doc. 15. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/12/2017) (jwh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pincaro et al v. Glassdoor, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paulo Pincaro
Represented By: Sergei Lemberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Nau
Represented By: Sergei Lemberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy L. Keiser
Represented By: Sergei Lemberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glassdoor, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?