Bluelink Marketing LLC et al v. Carney et al
||Bluelink Marketing LLC and Gerald Owens
||Declan Carney and Tagcade LLC
||September 13, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||James L. Cott
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 20, 2017
OPINION & ORDER re: 54 MOTION for Attorney Fees . filed by Declan Carney, Tagcade LLC. For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' motion is granted, and Defendants are awarded $17,296.88 in attorneys' fees. The Clerk is directed to terminate Docket No. 54. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 11/20/2017) (kgo)
|September 15, 2017
OPINION & ORDER re: 47 MOTION for Settlement Judgment. filed by Bluelink Marketing LLC, Gerald Owens, 43 MOTION to enforce settlement agreement . filed by Declan Carney, Tagcade LLC. For the reasons set forth abo ve, Defendants' motion (Dkt. No. 43) is granted, and Plaintiffs' cross-motion (Dkt. No. 47) is denied. Defendants' request for attorneys' fees is denied without prejudice. Defendants' counsel is to submit their fees motion w ith contemporaneous billing records by September 25, 2017. On the same date, Defendants shall also submit a proposed settlement judgment detailing the terms set forth at the March conference. Plaintiffs shall have until October 5, 2017 to file any opposition to the request for attorneys' fees and to submit a counter judgment, if any. Responses due by 10/5/2017 . (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 9/15/2017) (kgo) Modified on 9/15/2017 (kgo).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?