Denicolo v. The Board of Education of the City of New York and/or the Department of Education of the City of New York et al
| Anna Denicolo |
| The Board of Education of the City of New York and/or the Department of Education of the City of New York, Unal Karakas, Xiomara Fernandez, Jeffrey Eason and Desiree LaFontaine |
| 1:2016cv07416 |
| September 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER: In any event, if the Court reporter finds that a change in the transcript is required to reflect accurately what the reporter heard, the reporter can correct the transcript with appropriate notice to the parties. Second, the plaintiff argu es that this Court should intervene in a United States Department of Education Investigation. That request is denied. This case is now closed and, in any event, the Court would not intervene in an investigation without receiving briefing that explains how such relief is called for by the case that was pending before the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/9/2020) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ks)
|
|
Filing
87
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 86 Memo Endorsement. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memo-Endorsed Order dated December 18, 2019, all parties having agreed, this action is dismissed without p rejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), judgment is entered, and the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 12/19/2019) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal)(dt) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER: The Court has received documents filed by the plaintiff dated November 25, 2019 (Docket. Nos. 78, 79. 80). The court had already set a conference for December 12, 2019 at 4:30 p.m. The Court had also extended the time for the plaintiff to o btain new counsel to January 10, 2020. A copy of this Court's order dated November 21, 2019, is attached. (Docket No. 77). The Court has also received a letter filed by the plaintiff dated December 2, 2019 (Docket No. 81), requesting that all scheduled conferences be canceled. Therefore, the conference originally set for December 12, 2019 at 4:30 pm will be canceled. The plaintiff may still obtain new counsel until January 10, 2020. If the plaintiff does not obtain new counsel by January 10, 2020, the plaintiff must continue this case pro se. No further action is required with respect to the plaintiff's recent filings. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/3/2019) (rj)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER: Therefore, the Court confirms that the next conference in this case is on December 12, 2019 at 4:30 p.m. This is the conference in response to the plaintiff's letter dated October 14, 2019, in which the plaintiff requested to speak with the Court. The Court will also extend the plaintiff's time to obtain new counsel until January 10, 2020. If the plaintiff does not obtain new counsel by that date, the plaintiff must continue this case prose. The Court originally granted the mo tion of the plaintiff's prior counsel to withdraw in June, 2019, and had originally given the plaintiff until July 26, 2019 to obtain new counsel. An extension until January 10, 2020, provides ample time for the plaintiff to obtain new counsel. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/21/2019) (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
