Pointdujuour v. New York City Board/Department of Education et al
| Daniel Pointdujuour |
| New York City Board/Department of Education and Lawrence Becker |
| 1:2016cv07567 |
| September 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Suffolk |
| George B. Daniels |
| Andrew J. Peck |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER adopting 10 Report and Recommendations: Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Peck's Report and Recommendation, this Court finds no clear error in the Report and adopts it in full. Plaintiff filed his Complaint on September 27, 2016 (ECF No. 1) and was ordered to serve Defendants with the Complaint within 90 days of October 19, 2016. (ECF No. 5.) Magistrate Judge Peck was lenient in allowing even more than 90 days to pass before issuing the February 10, 2017 Order for Plaintiff to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure of service. (ECF No. 9.) As of February 28, 2017, the date on which Magistrate Judge Peck issued the Report, Plaintiff had still not served any Defendant or responded to the order to show cause. (Report, at 1.) Therefore, this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of service, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 7/11/2017) (jwh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
