FameFlynet, Inc. v. The Shoshanna Collection, LLC et al
| FameFlynet, Inc. |
| The Shoshanna Collection, LLC and Shoshanna Group, Inc. |
| 1:2016cv07645 |
| September 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
OPINION re: 50 MOTION to Alter Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e), filed by The Shoshanna Collection, LLC, Shoshanna Group, Inc., 45 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs, filed by FameFlynet, Inc. Based on the conclusions s et forth above, the motion of the Defendants to modify the October 2 Opinion is denied. The motion of the Plaintiff for attorneys' fees, as modified, in the amount of $17,620 is granted. It is so ordered. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 2/1/2018) (ras)
|
|
Filing
41
OPINION re: 32 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Motion. filed by The Shoshanna Collection, LLC, Shoshanna Group, Inc., 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by FameFlynet, Inc., 35 CROSS MOTION for Su mmary Judgment Notice of Motion. filed by The Shoshanna Collection, LLC, Shoshanna Group, Inc., 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by FameFlynet, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, Pl aintiff ' s motion for summaryjudgment is granted, and Defendants ' cross - motion for summaryjudgment is denied. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 9/29/2017) (js)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
