Brogdon v. City Of New York, et al
| Conell Brogdon |
| City of New York, Department of Corrections, Kings County District Attorney's Office, Lisa Berk and Unknown DOC Officers, John Doe #1, 2, 3 |
| 1:2016cv08076 |
| October 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| James C. Francis |
| Lewis A. Kaplan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation for 30 Report and Recommendations, 18 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Lisa Berk, City of New York. Plaintiff objects to the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Robert Lehrburger, whic h recommended that defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint be granted. To the extent that plaintiff objects, without specificity, to the entirety of the report and recommendation, the objections are overruled substant ially for the reason stated at page 2 of defendants' response. To the extent that he makes specific objections, we review de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Shah v. Helen Hayes Hospital, 252 Fed. Appx. 364 (2d Cir. 2007). Finding no error, the specific objections are overruled and the motion for summary judgment granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 9/30/2018) (anc) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
