Aretakis v. Caesars Entertainment et al
| John Aretakis |
| Caesars Entertainment, Rio Secco Golf Club, Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Caesars Palace, Butch Harmon, Millionaire Maker and Nike Golf |
| 1:2016cv08751 |
| November 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
OPINION AND ORDER re: 41 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. filed by Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Caesars Palace, Rio Secco Golf Club, Caesars Entertainment. Given the foregoing, the Amended Com plaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendants Caesars Entertainment Corporation, incorrectly named as "Caesars Entertainment"; Caesars Entertainment Operating Company; Desert Palace, Inc., doing business as Caesars Palace; and Rio Development Company, incorrectly named as Rio Secco Golf Club. In addition, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, on or before Friday, March 9, 2018, why the Amended Complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice as to Defendants Butch Harmon, Millionaire Maker, and Nike Golf for failure to serve within the time frame specified by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/23/2018) (kgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
