Davalloo v. Kaplan

Davalloo v. Kaplan

Petitioner:	Sheila Davalloo
Respondent:	Sabina Kaplan
Case Number:	1:2016cv09342
Filed:	December 1, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	White Plains Office
County:	Westchester
Presiding Judge:	Colleen McMahon
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 7, 2020	Filing 39 AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF OCTOBER 18, 2019: The Court amends its October 18, 2019, Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. #37), as follows: As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a ce rtificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d. Cir. 2005).In addition, the Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in goo d faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk is instructed to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner at the address on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 1/7/2020) (kv) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
October 21, 2019	Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 33 MOTION for Judgment filed by Sheila Davalloo, 32 MOTION filed by Sheila Davalloo. Petitioner's motion for relief from final judgment is DENIED. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. ( Docs. ##32, 33). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 10/18/2019) Copy mailed by chambers. (mml)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 7, 2020

Filing 39 AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF OCTOBER 18, 2019: The Court amends its October 18, 2019, Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. #37), as follows: As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a ce rtificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d. Cir. 2005).In addition, the Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in goo d faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk is instructed to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner at the address on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 1/7/2020) (kv) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

October 21, 2019

Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 33 MOTION for Judgment filed by Sheila Davalloo, 32 MOTION filed by Sheila Davalloo. Petitioner's motion for relief from final judgment is DENIED. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. ( Docs. ##32, 33). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 10/18/2019) Copy mailed by chambers. (mml)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davalloo v. Kaplan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Sheila Davalloo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Sabina Kaplan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?