Whelan v. The State Of New York et al
||The State Of New York, New York County District Attorney, Tandra Dawson and Jill Zuccardy, Esq.
||December 7, 2016
||New York Southern District Court
||Foley Square Office
||XX Out of State
||Paul G. Gardephe
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 9, 2018
ORDER for 33 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Jill Zuccardy, Esq., 24 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by The State Of New York, Tandra Dawson, 28 Motion to Dismiss filed by New York Count y District Attorney, 49 Report and Recommendations. Defendants have moved to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Mot. (Dkt. No. 24) at 1-2; Mot. (Dkt. No. 28) at 1; Mot. (Dkt. No. 33) at 1). On September 7, 2017, this Court referred Defendants' motions to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn. (See Order (Dkt. No. 46)) On December 19, 2017, Judge Netburn issued a thorough Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that this Court grant Defendants 9; motions to dismiss. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the reasons stated above, the R&R is adopted in its entirety, and Defendants' motions to dismiss are granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motions (Dkt. No s. 24, 28, 33) and to close this case. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order via certified mail to pro se Plaintiff Steven Whelan, Anna M. Kross Correctional Facility, 18-18 Hazen Street, East Elmhurst, NY 11370-1383. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 2/9/2018) (cf)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?