Pintur et al v. Rogic et al
| Mladen Pintur and Presenta Nova Inc |
| Helen Rogic and One Interior LLC |
| 1:2016cv09696 |
| December 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER: Adopting REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 60 Report and Recommendations. Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Parkers thorough and well-reasoned Report, to which no objection has been made, the Court finds no clear error. Therefore, the Court ad opts the Report in its entirety. Accordingly, Ms. Franklin's pro hac vice admission is revoked and Plaintiffs are directed to obtain new counsel within 45 days, except to the extent that Plaintiff Mladen Pintur wishes to proceed pro se with resp ect to his individual claims. If Mr. Pintur wishes to do so, he must file a notice of appearance on the public docket within two weeks of this order, or by Friday, December 1, 2017. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. This Order resolves Docket Entry No. 60. SO ORDERED., Attorney Tamiko Rochelle Franklin terminated. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/16/2017) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
