Navig8 Chemicals Asia PTE LTD. v. Vedanta Limited

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Navig8 Chemicals Asia PTE LTD. v. Vedanta Limited

Navig8 Chemicals Asia PTE LTD. v. Vedanta Limited

Plaintiff:	Navig8 Chemicals Asia PTE LTD.
Defendant:	Vedanta Limited
Case Number:	1:2016cv09799
Filed:	December 20, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Laura Taylor Swain
Nature of Suit:	Marine
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1333
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 13, 2018	Filing 90 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: for (16 in 1:16-cv-09799-LTS-KHP) Motion to Vacate filed by Vedanta Limited, (28 in 1:16-cv-09799-LTS-KHP) Motion to Vacate filed by Vedanta Limited, (18 in 1:16-cv-09827-LTS-KHP) Motion to Vacate filed by Vedanta Limited. For the foregoing reasons, the Court adopts Judge Parker's thorough and well reasoned Report, with the exception of the last paragraph on page 17 through the end of page 18, and grants Defendants' motions to vacate the maritime orders of attachment and garnishment. The objection to Judge Parker's denial of Plaintiffs' request for further discovery is overruled, and that ruling stands. The Memorandum Order resolves 16-CV-9827, Docket Entry No . 18 and 16-CV- 9799, Docket Entry Nos. 16 and 28. This consolidated case remains referred to Judge Parker for general pretrial management. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/13/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:16-cv-09799-LTS-KHP, 1:16-cv-09827-LTS-KHP(ama)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 13, 2018

Filing 90 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: for (16 in 1:16-cv-09799-LTS-KHP) Motion to Vacate filed by Vedanta Limited, (28 in 1:16-cv-09799-LTS-KHP) Motion to Vacate filed by Vedanta Limited, (18 in 1:16-cv-09827-LTS-KHP) Motion to Vacate filed by Vedanta Limited. For the foregoing reasons, the Court adopts Judge Parker's thorough and well reasoned Report, with the exception of the last paragraph on page 17 through the end of page 18, and grants Defendants' motions to vacate the maritime orders of attachment and garnishment. The objection to Judge Parker's denial of Plaintiffs' request for further discovery is overruled, and that ruling stands. The Memorandum Order resolves 16-CV-9827, Docket Entry No . 18 and 16-CV- 9799, Docket Entry Nos. 16 and 28. This consolidated case remains referred to Judge Parker for general pretrial management. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/13/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:16-cv-09799-LTS-KHP, 1:16-cv-09827-LTS-KHP(ama)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Navig8 Chemicals Asia PTE LTD. v. Vedanta Limited
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Navig8 Chemicals Asia PTE LTD.
Represented By:	Anne Casey Levasseur
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Vedanta Limited
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?