Singh et al v. Dany Restoration Inc. et al
||Tarsem Singh, Harpreet Singh, Paramjeet Singh, Gurdev Singh, Gurpreet Singh and Hardev Singh
||Dany Restoration Inc. and Asad Hussain
||May 19, 2017
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||Jesse M. Furman
|Nature of Suit:
||Fair Labor Standards Act
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 17, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Harpreet Singh, Paramjeet Singh, Gurdev Singh, Gurpreet Singh, Tarsem Singh, Hardev Singh. On June 29, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Summary Judgmen t against remaining Defendant Asad Hussain, who is proceeding without counsel. (Docket No. 68). The same day, Plaintiffs served their motion on Hussain. (Docket No. 71). After the July 13, 2018 deadline for Hussain to file his opposition had passed, the Court ordered him to show cause why Plaintiffs' motion should not be deemed unopposed. (Docket No. 73). To date, Hussain has yet to respond that order or the motion. After reviewing Plaintiffs' motion and the supporting materials, the C ourt finds that there is no genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment as to all portions of the motion. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiffs' unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs shall file and serve a proposed judgment and make any application for attorney's fees, supported by contemporaneous documentation, by August 24, 2018. Any opposition to the proposed judgment or attorney's fee application shall be filed by September 10, 2018. The Clerk of Court is ordered to terminate Docket No. 68 and to mail a copy of this Order to Defendant Hussain. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 8/16/2018) (ne) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?