Valdez v. Stewart
||May 31, 2017
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||Katherine Polk Failla
||Henry B. Pitman
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 17, 2021
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Cave's well-reasoned and comprehensive Report in full. Accordingly, Valdez's Petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, as is his request to stay the Petition. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close this case. Furthermore, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A), as Valdez has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/17/2021) (nb)
|September 14, 2018
OPINION AND ORDER re: 13 APPLICATION to Appoint Counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3006(A)(g) (Habeas Corpus Petition) filed by Denni Valdez. Accordingly, petitioner's motion for the appointment of counsel is granted. The Court's CJA cle rk is respectfully requested to select counsel for petitioner from the Court's CJA Habeas Panel. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to mark Docket Item 13 closed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 9/14/2018) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ne) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?