Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp v. Daniloff
Plaintiff: Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp
Defendant: Elliot Daniloff
Case Number: 1:2017cv04181
Filed: June 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Victor Marrero
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 126 PROTECTIVE AGREEMENT AND ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 4/9/2024) (jca)
February 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 124 DECISION AND ORDER denying 114 Motion for Attorney Fees. For the reasons stated above, the Court DENIES the motion of plaintiff Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp. for an award of attorneys' fees and costs against defendant Elliot Daniloff under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the pending motion at Dkt. No. 114. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 2/21/24) (yv)
June 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER OF JUDGMENT Accordingly, it is: ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. Daniloff shall pay Bloomfield compensatory damages for Daniloff's fraud and breaches of contract in the amount of $18,500,000; 2. Daniloff shall pay Bloomfield pu nitive damages in the amount of $1,000,000; 3. Daniloff shall pay Bloomfield pre-judgment interest on all compensatory damages as calculated in the below table in the amount of $14,909,179; 4. Daniloff shall pay Bloomfield post-judgment i nterest on the full amounts of outstanding compensatory and punitive damages awarded at a rate of 4.91 percent, compounded annually, running from May 24, 2023; and 5. This order shall constitute a final and appealable judgment, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction over any matter pertaining to this judgment, including Bloomfield's motion for attorney's fees and costs, which would be the subject of an additional judgment. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 6/1/2023) (jca) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
May 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 108 DECISION AND ORDER For the reasons stated above, it is hereby ORDERED that judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff Bloomfield Investment Resources Corporation ("Bloomfield") against defendant Elliot Daniloff ("Daniloff" ;) on Bloomfield's fraudulent inducement and both breach of contract claims in the amount of $18.5 million for compensatory damages plus prejudgment interest calculated at a rate of nine percent per annum on $25 million from Decembe r 16, 2014 until May 15, 2015; nine percent per annum on $23 million from May 16, 2015 until December 2, 2016; and nine percent per annum on $18.5 million from December 3, 2016 to the date of this Decision and Order; $1 million in p unitive damages; and post-judgment interest on the full judgment amount at the rate prescribed by 28 U.S.C. Section 1961(a) from the date of this Decision and Order, as calculated by the Clerk of Court; and it is further ORDERED that within seven ( 7) days of the date of this Decision and Order, Bloomfield shall submit a proposed order of judgment that includes a calculation of its damages, prejudgment interest, and a provision for the imposition of post-judgment interest as detailed above; and it is further ORDERED that Bloomfield may submit an application for reasonable attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than June 6, 2023. Daniloff may respond to the application no later than June 13, 2023. And Bloomfield may file a reply no later than June 20, 2023. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 6/6/2023., Replies due by 6/20/2023., Responses due by 6/13/2023) (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 5/23/2023) (jca)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER AUTHORIZING PERSONAL ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND GENERAL PURPOSE COMPUTING DEVICES INTO THE COURTHOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FOR USE AT TRIAL: Upon submission of written application of this Court, it is hereby: ORDERED that the fo llowing attorneys and trial support personnel are authorized to bring the Personal Electronic Devices and General Purpose Computing Devices (collectively, "Devices") listed below into the Courthouse for use at trial of the above-captioned matter. ORDERED that for the devices checked below, SDNY Courtroom Wi-Fi access shall be provided. The dates for which such authorization is provided are October 20, 2022, through October 31, 2022. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 10/13/2022) (ate)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER All parties are advised that a final pretrial conference before Judge Marrero has been scheduled for October 21, 2022 at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 15B at the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. SO ORDERED. (Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/21/2022 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 15B, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Victor Marrero.) (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 10/03/2022) (jca)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER: Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants request for a premotion conference in advance of moving for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 85) is DENIED, and it is further ORDERED that within twenty days of the entry of this Order the parties shall submit a timeline for trial in August 2022 or thereafter. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 3/30/2022) (jca)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER: On October 18, 2021, Defendant's informed Defendant and the Court of their intention to move for summary judgment. On October 25, 2021, Defendant responded with a letter in opposition. On November 1, Plaintiff filed a reply letter. On March 1, 2022, the parties wrote to update the Court about their availability for a conference or trial. At this time, the Court concludes that no further briefing will be accepted for the anticipated motion for summary judgment. The C ourt will resolve Defendants motion for summary judgment on the basis of the parties' premotion letters. See Kapitalforeningen Lgernes Invest. v. United Techs. Corp., 779 F. Appx 69, 70 (2d Cir. 2019) (affirming the district court's ruling deeming an exchange of letters as a motion). Upon resolution of the motion, the Court will discuss a trial schedule with the parties, if necessary (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 3/2/2022) (js)
June 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 66 DECISION AND ORDER: Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion so deemed by the Court as filed by defendant Elliott Daniloff ("Daniloff") for reconsideration or leave to amend (Dkt. No. 55) is DENIED. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 6/7/2021) (js)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon my annexed declaration, and subject to the approval of the Court, Kristen Hindley hereby withdraws as counsel for plaintiff Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp., ("Bloomfield") and shall be removed from the Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) notification list in the above-captioned matter. I am a partner at Reed Smith, LLP and will continue to represent Bloomfield in this proceeding. SO ORDERED. ( Attorney Kristen Giannone Hindley terminated.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 5/12/21) (yv)
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 54 DECISION AND ORDER: Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion so deemed by the Court as filed by plaintiff Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp. to dismiss the counterclaims of defendant Elliott Daniloff pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Dkt. No. 53-1) is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Elliot Daniloff and Elliot Daniloff terminated. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 4/26/2021) (mml)
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER REQUEST FOR STATUS UPDATE: On July 1, 2020, the Court issued an order directing the parties to file a status update in this matter by August 15, 2020. The public file contains no record of a status update, and no other communication with th e Court has been received. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties inform the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order concerning the status of this litigation. So Ordered.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 11/12/2020) (js)
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER: In reviewing the Docket Sheet for this matter, the Court noted that there has been no recorded action or correspondence known to the Court regarding the status of the matter since October 3, 2019. At that time plaintiff reported that the p arties had reached an agreement and the Court directed the parties to submit a status report by January 22, 2020. Plaintiff is directed to inform the Court by February 28, 2020 of the status of the matter and indicate whether any cause remains for co ntinuing to retain this action on the Court ' s active or suspense docket. In the event the Court receives no response to this Order by the date indicated the case shall be dismissed.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 1/18/2020) (ks)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp v. Daniloff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp
Represented By: Steven Cooper
Represented By: Christopher Neil Gray
Represented By: Kristen Giannone Hindley
Represented By: Ian Marcus Turetsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elliot Daniloff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?