Gupta v. Headstrong, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Arvind Gupta
Defendant: Headstrong, Inc., Genpact Limited and Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor
Case Number: 1:2017cv05286
Filed: July 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 200 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 198 MOTION to Alter Judgment . filed by Arvind Gupta. For the foregoing reasons, the motion to alter the judgment is denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at docket number 198 and to mail a copy of this Order to Gupta. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 3/16/2023) (ate)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 197 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 191 MOTION to Vacate 177 Memorandum & Opinion, 182 Judgment on Attorney Fees, . filed by Arvind Gupta. For the foregoing reasons, the motion to vacate the judgment is denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at docket number 191 and to mail a copy of this Order to Gupta. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 7/19/2022) (ate)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 190 ORDER denying as moot 185 Motion to Stay re: 185 MOTION to Stay re: 177 Memorandum & Opinion,,, 182 Judgment on Attorney Fees,,, . Plaintiff Arvind Gupta, proceeding pro se, brought this action against Defenda nts Headstrong, Inc. and Genpact Limited (collectively, "Headstrong") for wages allegedly owed to him under the H-1B provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act and for judicial review, under the Administrative Procedure Act, of orders of the Department of Labor dismissing his administrative claims against Headstrong. On September 9, 2019, the Court granted Headstrong's motion to dismiss. Dkt. 137. Gupta and Headstrong subsequently filed cros s-motions for attorneys' fees. On September 28, 2020, the Court denied Gupta's motion and granted Headstrong's motion with modifications; on October 26, 2020, it issued a judgment ordering Gupta to pay $105,081.05 i n attorneys' fees. Dkts. 177, 182. Gupta subsequently appealed this Court's decision to the Second Circuit. On November 24, 2020, he moved to stay the Court's judgment until 30 days after the Second Circuit's resolution of th e appeal. Dkt. 185. On October 19, 2021, the Second Circuit affirmed this Court's judgment in a summary order. Gupta v. Headstrong, No. 20-3657 (2d Cir. Oct. 19, 2021). The Second Circuit's mandate issued yesterday. Dkt. 189. Accordingly, Gupta's motion to stay the judgment pending his appeal is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at docket number 185. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 2/11/2022) (tg)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 182 JUDGMENT: It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasonsstated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion & Order dated September 28, 2020 (the "Order"), Defendants Headstrong, Inc. and Genpact Limited's (the "Headst rong Defendants") motion for attorneys' fees is granted in the amount of One Hundred and Five Thousand Eighty One Dollars and Five Cents ($105,081.05). Plaintiff Arvind Gupta's ("Plaintiff") motion for fees is denied. Wi thin thirty (30) days of the date of this Judgment, Plaintiff shall remit to Jackson Lewis P.C. a check made payable to "Genpact Limited" in the amount of One Hundred and Five Thousand Eighty One Dollars and Five Cents ($105,081.05) pursuant to the Court's Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 10/26/2020) (ama)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 178 ORDER re: 137 Clerk's Judgment. It is hereby ORDERED that Headstrong shall submit a proposed order of judgment with respect to the grant of attorneys' fees by October 23, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 10/16/2020) (kv)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 177 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 162 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Exhibit PX-48 in Support of Memorandum for Costs addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Arvind Gupta dated December 3, 2019 filed by Arvind Gupta, 159 MOTION for Attorney Fees Costs, Expenses and Fees filed by Arvind Gupta, 143 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Genpact Limited, Headstrong, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies Gupta's motion for attorneys 9; fees and grants Headstrong's motion, subject to the modifications discussed above. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at Docket Entries 143, 159, and 162. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/28/2020) (rro)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 172 ORDER re: 145 Declaration in Support of Motion filed by Genpact Limited, Headstrong, Inc.. Accordingly, no later than September 21, 2020, the Headstrong Defendants shall also file a letter describing the level of experience of each of the a ttorneys for whom they seek fees. The Headstrong Defendants shall promptly serve a copy of this Order and letter and/or unredacted billing records on Plaintiff and file proof of such service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/14/2020) (kv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gupta v. Headstrong, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arvind Gupta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Headstrong, Inc.
Represented By: Maria Biaggi
Represented By: Alison Blair Crane
Represented By: Jonathan Charles Huckabay
Represented By: Kirti Vaidya Reddy
Represented By: Dana Loryn G. Weisbrod
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Genpact Limited
Represented By: Maria Biaggi
Represented By: Alison Blair Crane
Represented By: Jonathan Charles Huckabay
Represented By: Kirti Vaidya Reddy
Represented By: Dana Loryn G. Weisbrod
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By: Jimmy Lorenzo Arce
Represented By: Joshua Samuel Press
Represented By: Kirti Vaidya Reddy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?