Mercedes v. City of New York et al
Plaintiff: Jonathan Mercedes
Defendant: City of New York, Richard Evans, John Does and Richard Roes
Case Number: 1:2017cv07368
Filed: September 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Alvin K. Hellerstein
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 157 ORDER granting 156 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Granted. An order of reference to a magistrate judge will be filed on ECF. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 3/11/24) (yv)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 138 ORDER granting 137 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 7/6/22) (yv)
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER: A suggestion of settlement having been made, this case is dismissed. If the settlement is not consummated within 30 days of this order, or an authorized enlarged date, either party may apply by letter for restoration of the action within 10 days after the close of said period. All pending court dates are cancelled. The Clerk is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 6/6/2022) (kv)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER granting 133 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. The motion to adjourn trial one week, to begin July 25, is granted. The date of the Final Pre Trial Conference, July 7, 2022, 2:30 pm remains in effect. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 11/16/21) (yv)
April 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 117 ORDER granting 116 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Trial is adjourned until January 25, 2021. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 4/2/20) (yv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mercedes v. City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Mercedes
Represented By: Jeffrey Adam Rothman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Roes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?