IDEAVILLAGE PRODUCTS CORP. v. SHENZHEN CITY POLY HUI FOREIGN TRADE CO., LTD. D/B/A A_BRILLIANT, et al.
| 1:2017cv08704 |
| January 31, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT: WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on the 22nd day of April, 2020 in favor of Plaintiff Idea village Products Corp. and against Defendant Aphrodi Store in the amount of $50,000.00, and said judgment having been satisfied, and it is certified that there are no outstanding executions with any Sheriff or Marshall. THEREFORE, satisfaction of said judgment is hereby acknowledged, and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed to make an entry of the satisfaction on the docket of said judgment against Defendant Aphrodi Store. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/28/2025) (ks) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
|
|
Filing
89
FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER: 1) Judgment is granted in favor of Plaintiff on all claims properly plead against Defaulting Defendants in the Complaint; 1) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that because it would se rve both the compensatory and punitive purposes of the Lanham and Copyright Acts' prohibitions on willful infringement, and because Plaintiff has sufficiently set forth the basis for the statutory damages award requested in its OSC for Default Judgment, the Court finds such an award to be reasonable and Plaintiff is awarded fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) ("Defaulting Defendants' Individual Damages Award") in statutory damages against each of the forty-three (43) D efaulting Defendants pursuant to Section 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c) of the Lanham Act and/or Section 504(c) of the Copyright Act for a total of $2,150,000.00 (Two Million One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars) ("Defaulting Defendants' Coll ective Damages Award") and post-judgment interest; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defaulting Defendants, their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, successors and assigns and all persons acting in concert with or under the direction of Defaulting Defendants (regardless of whether located in the United States or abroad), who receive actual notice of this Order, including, without limitation, any: (1) banks, financial institutions, credit card companies and pa yment processing agencies, such as PayPal Inc. ("PayPal"), the Alibaba Group d/b/a Alibaba.com and Aliexpress.com ("Alibaba") and Dunhuang Group d/b/a DHgate.com ("DHgate") payment services (e.g., Alipay.com Co., Ltd., A nt Financial Services Group or DHpay.com) (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Financial Institutions") and (2) Alibaba.com, AliExpress.com and DHgate.com ("Digital Marketplaces") (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Restrained Persons") are permanently enjoined and restrained, as further set forth in this Order. The Court releases the Twenty-Five Thousand U.S. Dollar ($25,000.00) security bond that Plaintiff submitted in connection with the actio n to counsel for Plaintiff, Epstein Drangel, LLP, 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 2520, New York, NY 10165; and 4) This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter and the parties in order to construe and enforce this Default Judgment Order. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/22/2020) (mml) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER: The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Moses dated December 12, 2019. No Objections have been filed and the time for filing Objections has passed. In any event, the Court finds that the Report and Recommen dation are well reasoned, and the Court adopts them. The plaintiff should submit a proposed judgment in accordance with the Report and Recommendation by February 14, 2020. By February 14, 2020, the plaintiff should also show cause by written submiss ion why the claims against the eight defendants referred to on page 22 of the Report and Recommendation should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The plaintiff is also directed to serve a copy of this Order on the Defaulting Defendants in accordance with the procedure referred to by Magistrate Judge Moses on page 22 of her Report and Recommendation and file proof of service by February 14, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/31/2020) (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: IDEAVILLAGE PRODUCTS CORP. v. SHENZHEN CITY POLY HUI FOREIGN TRADE CO., LTD. D/B/A A_BRILLIANT, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
