Richardson et al v. City of New York
| Annette Richardson, Deborah Bowman, Liza Horsley, Debra Poe, Dino Riojas, Arlene Simmons and Stephanie Thomas |
| City of New York |
| 1:2017cv09447 |
| December 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
ORDER granting 143 Motion to Substitute Party. Upon consideration of the Unopposed Motion to Substitute Necole Simpkins for Brenda McKiver as Plaintiff, the memorandum and declaration in support of the motion, the letter motion for an extens ion of time submitted on September 15, 2023, and all the records and proceedings in the action, it is hereby ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion is hereby granted, Brenda McKiver shall no longer be a plaintiff in the action, and Necole Simpkins, as representative of the estate of Brenda McKiver, shall be substituted for Ms. McKiver as the sole remaining plaintiff in the action. The Clerk is directed to close ECF No. 143. Necole Simpkins added. Brenda McKiver terminated. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/20/2023) (ate)
|
|
Filing
120
FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 54(B): Based on the Stipulation for Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54(b) and the entire record in this case, the Court hereby enters final judgment in this case with respect to the claims of seven of th e eight named Plaintiffs Annette Richardson, Deborah Bowman, Debra Poe, Dino Riojas, Stephanie Thomas, Jon Watson, and Erica Richardson against Defendant City of New York. The final judgment is being entered pursuant to the terms of a settlement negotiated between the seven Plaintiffs and the City. No judgment shall be entered with respect to the claims of Plaintiff Brenda McKiver, whom the parties represent is deceased. For the reasons set forth in the Stipulation, the Court determines that there is no just reason for delay in entering final judgment as to the seven settling Plaintiffs identified above. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 12/21/2021) (va)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER terminating 102 Motion re: 102 MOTION for Clarification of the Court's May 12, 2021 Opinion and Order on Class Certification re: 101 Memorandum & Opinion,,, . The Court hereby clarifies that its May 12, 20 21 opinion and order dismissed Annette Richardson's, Debra Poe's, and Stephanie Thomas's claims for injunctive relief only, preserving their claims for money damages. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 102. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 5/26/2021) (js)
|
|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 79 MOTION to Certify Class . filed by Debra Poe, Brenda McKiver, Dino Riojas, Erica Richardson, Deborah Bowman, Liza Horsley, Annette Richardson, 75 MOTION for Summary Judgment Partially a s to Plaintiffs Annette Richardson, Erica Richardson, Debra Poe, Dino Riojas, and Stephanie Thomas. MOTION to Strike Document No. 55 Amended Complaint's Disparate Impact Class Allegations. filed by City of New York. For the foregoing reasons, the City's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and the City's motion to strike is DENIED. Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is also DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Number 75 and 79.So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 5/12/2021) (js)
|
|
Filing
49
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 33 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Michael Lieder dated November 13, 2018. filed by Debra Poe, Arlene Simmons, Dino Riojas, Deborah Bowman, Liza Horsley, Stephanie Thomas, Annette Richardson. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall file their amended complaint on or before April 22, 2019. The City is directed to answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint within three weeks after it is filed. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 33. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 4/8/2019) (js)
|
|
Filing
26
OPINION AND ORDER re: 11 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint MOTION to Stay re: 4 Complaint Stay Discovery filed by City of New York. For the foregoing reasons, the City's motion to stay discovery is DENIED as m oot, Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED as moot to the extent they allege discrimination against EMS employees, and the City's motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' Section 1981 and NYCHRL claims insofar as they allege pay di scrimination and as to all federal claims accruing prior to December 1, 2014. The Citys motion to dismiss, however, is DENIED as to (1) Plaintiffs' Section 1981 claims accruing after December 1, 2014, insofar as they allege a pattern or pract ice of intentional discrimination in hiring and job placement; (2) Plaintiffs' NYCHRL claims insofar as they allege a pattern or practice of intentional discrimination in hiring and job placement; (3) and Plaintiffs' NYCHRL claims insofa r as they allege that the Citys hiring and job-placement practices have a disparate impact on African Americans. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 11. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/28/2018) (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
