Adelante Alabama Worker Center et al v. Department Of Homeland Security et al
Plaintiff: Adelante Alabama Worker Center, Detention Watch Network, Greater Birmingham Ministries, Immigrant Defense Project and Southerners on New Ground
Defendant: Department Of Homeland Security and Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
Case Number: 1:2017cv09557
Filed: December 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Gregory H. Woods
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05:552
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, Department Of Homeland Security, 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendants' Mo tion for Summary Judgment filed by Detention Watch Network, Southerners on New Ground, Immigrant Defense Project, Adelante Alabama Worker Center, Greater Birmingham Ministries. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART without prejudice. Plaintiff's cross-motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART without prejudice. Within one week of the date of this opinion and order, Defendants are directed to submit to the Court an unredacted version of the entirety of the Released Records. At present, the Court only expects to conduct in camera review of the Super-Recommendations Memo, but requests the entirety of the Released Records t o facilitate future in camera review, should such review prove necessary. Defendants are further directed to re-review the Experts Reports, the November 2, 2012 memo, and Attachment C to the Released Records, consistent with this opinion, to r elease additional material as appropriate, and make corresponding updates to the Vaughn Index. Additionally, Defendants are directed to release the identities and professional backgrounds of the Experts. The Court will set a deadline for the additional release of records and service of the updated Vaughn Index by subsequent orderwhich it expects to issue after the Court rules on its in camera review of the Super-Recommendations Memo. Summary judgment is granted to the Defendants as to Attachment A to the Released Records. Released Records at 118-28. Defendants need not re-review either Attachment A, nor the Super-Recommendations Memo itself, nor update the Vaughn Index as to those materials. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at Dkt. Nos. 38 and 41. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/26/2019) (mro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adelante Alabama Worker Center et al v. Department Of Homeland Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adelante Alabama Worker Center
Represented By: Patrick Daniel Llewellyn
Represented By: Adam R Pulver
Represented By: Jessica Myers Vosburgh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Detention Watch Network
Represented By: Patrick Daniel Llewellyn
Represented By: Adam R Pulver
Represented By: Jessica Myers Vosburgh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Greater Birmingham Ministries
Represented By: Patrick Daniel Llewellyn
Represented By: Adam R Pulver
Represented By: Jessica Myers Vosburgh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Immigrant Defense Project
Represented By: Patrick Daniel Llewellyn
Represented By: Adam R Pulver
Represented By: Jessica Myers Vosburgh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Southerners on New Ground
Represented By: Patrick Daniel Llewellyn
Represented By: Adam R Pulver
Represented By: Jessica Myers Vosburgh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department Of Homeland Security
Represented By: Samuel Hilliard Dolinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
Represented By: Samuel Hilliard Dolinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?