Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Maersk Line et al
| Hartford Fire Insurance Co. |
| Maersk Line, Blanchard Transportation Services, Inc., Albatrans, Inc. and XYZ Corp. |
| 1:2018cv00121 |
| January 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| P. Kevin Castel |
| Other Contract |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 30701 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: The Court therefore concludes that Hartford has not established a prima facie case, and that even if it had, the evidence adduced at trial demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that the cargo was dam aged by the insufficiency of package, and Hartford has not demonstrated a concurrent cause of loss in the fault and neglect of Maersk. The Court finds by a preponderance of evidence in favor of Maersk. Sapsan LLC and Albatrans, Inc. having been previously dismissed by the Court, the Clerk shall enter final judgment for all defendants and close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 11/10/2021) (ama) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER: Bench trial is scheduled for October 21, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 11D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. SO ORDERED., ( Bench Trial set for 10/21/2021 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 11D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge P. Kevin Castel.) (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/27/2021) (ama)
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER: In the exercise of discretion, the Court allowed plaintiff to belatedly call Bruno and submit his direct testimony of Bruno by June 22, which was less than a month before the then-scheduled date of trial. Plaintiff did not. Letter application (Doc. 129) which seeks to compel the defendant to produce Bruno for cross-examination on his deposition testimony is DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 7/22/2021) (ama)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER: The final pretrial conference will take place as scheduled on Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 12 p.m. in Courtroom 11D. To facilitate access to the courthouse on the day of the conference, follow the instructions attached to this Order.Members of the public may access an audio feed of the proceeding through the following numbers: Call-in: (888) 363-4749 Access Code: 3667981. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 6/11/2021) (js)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER: By May 3, 2021, plaintiff shall file its direct testimony by affidavit and trial brief, and shall serve defendants its portion of the Joint Pretrial Order. By May 17, 2021, defendants shall file their direct testimony by affidavit and trial b riefs, and shall serve plaintiff their portion of the Joint Pretrial Order. The Joint Pretrial Order shall be filed by May 24, 2021. The final pretrial conference shall be on June 15, 2021 at 12 p.m. in Courtroom 11D. SO ORDERED., ( Pretrial Order due by 5/24/2021., Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/15/2021 at 12:00 PM in Courtroom 11D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge P. Kevin Castel.) (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 3/23/2021) (ama)
|
|
Filing
107
OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons explained, Maersk's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (Docket #83.) Albatrans's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. (Docket #97.) The Clerk is directed to terminate the motions and the related let ter-motion. (Docket #92.) SO ORDERED. re: 97 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Albatrans, Inc. 92 LETTER MOTION for Conference on Albatrans Motion for Summary Judgment addressed to Judge P. Kevin Castel from Andrew R. Spector, Es q. dated September 30, 2020. Document filed by Albatrans, Inc. 83 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Pursuant to Rule 56 F.R.C.P. filed by Maersk Line. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 3/11/2021) (rjm) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
70
OPINION AND ORDER re: 49 MOTION to Dismiss: Sapsan's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) is GRANTED. Because the Court does not have personal jurisdiction over Sapsan, it does not reach its motion to dismiss Maersk's cross-claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion. (Docket # 49.) (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/17/2019) (jwh) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
