Amos v. 1199 Seiu National Benefit Fund, 1199 Seiu Health Care and Home Care Employees Pension Funds, The 1199 Seiu Employment, Training and Job Security Fund and the 1199 Seiu Employer Child Care Fund et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Amos v. 1199 Seiu National Benefit Fund, 1199 Seiu Health Care and Home Care Employees Pension Funds, The 1199 Seiu Employment, Training and Job Security Fund and the 1199 Seiu Employer Child Care Fund et al

Plaintiff:	Lasharan Shantel Amos
Defendant:	1199 Seiu National Benefit Fund, 1199 Seiu Health Care and Home Care Employees Pension Funds, The 1199 Seiu Employment, Training and Job Security Fund and the 1199 Seiu Employer Child Care Fund and J.P. Morgan Chase
Case Number:	1:2018cv00962
Filed:	February 2, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Kings
Presiding Judge:	Paul A. Engelmayer
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1001
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 9, 2022	Filing 7 ORDER: On April 20, 2018, the Court issued an order in this matter that directed the Clerk of Court to refund pro se plaintiff Lasharan Shantel Amos her $400 filing fee, after she moved to voluntarily dismiss this case. Dkt. 5. On April 24, 2022, the Finance Department disbursed this amount as a refund to Amos. See docket entry dated April 27, 2018. On December 6, 2022, the Finance Department notified the Court that it had recently received another check from Amos, this time for � 36;402, to pay the filing fee in this matter. That same day, based on this guidance from the Finance Department, the Court directed the Clerk of Court to refund Amos her recent $402 payment by disbursing a check to her address on file. Dkt. 6. On December 7, 2022, after the Court issued that order, the Finance Department informed the Court that, based on new information, the correct amount owed to Amos is $102, not $402. Accordingly, the Court amends its order dated December 6, 2022, Dkt. 6, to direct the Clerk of Court to refund plaintiff Amos $102 by disbursing a check to her address on file. This case remains closed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/9/2022) (vfr) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
December 6, 2022	Filing 6 ORDER: On April 20, 2018, the Court issued an order in this matter that directed the Clerk of Court to refund pro se plaintiff Lasharan Shantel Amos her $400 filing fee, after she moved to voluntarily dismiss this case. Dkt. 5. On April 24, 2 022, the Finance Department disbursed this amount as a refund to Amos. See docket entry dated April 27, 2018. On December 6, 2022, the Finance Department notified the Court that it had recently received another check from Amos, this time for $40 2, to pay the filing fee in this matter. Consistent with the Court's prior order, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to refund Amos her recent $402 payment by disbursing a check to her address on file. This case remains dismissed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/6/2022) (vfr) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.

Date Filed

Document Text

December 9, 2022

Filing 7 ORDER: On April 20, 2018, the Court issued an order in this matter that directed the Clerk of Court to refund pro se plaintiff Lasharan Shantel Amos her $400 filing fee, after she moved to voluntarily dismiss this case. Dkt. 5. On April 24, 2022, the Finance Department disbursed this amount as a refund to Amos. See docket entry dated April 27, 2018. On December 6, 2022, the Finance Department notified the Court that it had recently received another check from Amos, this time for � 36;402, to pay the filing fee in this matter. That same day, based on this guidance from the Finance Department, the Court directed the Clerk of Court to refund Amos her recent $402 payment by disbursing a check to her address on file. Dkt. 6. On December 7, 2022, after the Court issued that order, the Finance Department informed the Court that, based on new information, the correct amount owed to Amos is $102, not $402. Accordingly, the Court amends its order dated December 6, 2022, Dkt. 6, to direct the Clerk of Court to refund plaintiff Amos $102 by disbursing a check to her address on file. This case remains closed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/9/2022) (vfr) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.

December 6, 2022

Filing 6 ORDER: On April 20, 2018, the Court issued an order in this matter that directed the Clerk of Court to refund pro se plaintiff Lasharan Shantel Amos her $400 filing fee, after she moved to voluntarily dismiss this case. Dkt. 5. On April 24, 2 022, the Finance Department disbursed this amount as a refund to Amos. See docket entry dated April 27, 2018. On December 6, 2022, the Finance Department notified the Court that it had recently received another check from Amos, this time for $40 2, to pay the filing fee in this matter. Consistent with the Court's prior order, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to refund Amos her recent $402 payment by disbursing a check to her address on file. This case remains dismissed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/6/2022) (vfr) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amos v. 1199 Seiu National Benefit Fund, 1199 Seiu Health Care and Home Care Employees Pension Funds, The 1199 Seiu Employment, Training and Job Security Fund and the 1199 Seiu Employer Child Care Fund et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lasharan Shantel Amos
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: 1199 Seiu National Benefit Fund, 1199 Seiu Health Care and Home Care Employees Pension Funds, The 1199 Seiu Employment, Training and Job Security Fund and the 1199 Seiu Employer Child Care Fund
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Chase
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?