Williams v. Classic Security et al
| Robert Williams |
| Classic Security and S.L. Green Realty |
| 1:2018cv01691 |
| February 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Unassigned |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER: Because Plaintiff Robert Williams has declined to replead, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/19/2020) (js)
|
|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). filed by Classic Security. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Classic Security's motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs Amended Complai nt is DISMISSED. Plaintiff is granted leave to replead, provided that he can do so in a manner consistent with this opinion. Any amended complaint shall be filed on or before October 18, 2019. If Plaintiff decides not to replead but wishes to file an appeal from this opinion and order, he shall file a letter to that effect no later than October 18, 2019, in which event the Court will enter final judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Number 26. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/18/2019) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (js)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
