Durso et al v. Al-Saleh Grocery Corp. et al
| John R. Durso, Joseph Fontano, Neil Gonzalvo, Debra Bollbach, Teri Noble, Jon Greenfield, John Catsimatidis, Angelo Avena, Morton Sloan and Jacob Dimant, M.D. |
| Al-Saleh Grocery Corp., Al Saleh Laundromat Corp., 169 MK Grocery Corp and Kareem Laundromat Corp |
| 1:2018cv02008 |
| March 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Nassau |
| Cathy Seibel |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
MEMO ENDORSED ORDER for 30 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Jacob Dimant, M.D., John Catsimatidis, Neil Gonzalvo, John R. Durso, Debra Bollbach, Teri Noble, Morton Sloan, Jon Greenfield, Angelo Avena, Joseph Fontano, 35 Report a nd Recommendations. ENDORSEMENT: No objections to this Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") have been received, and accordingly I review it for clear error. I find no error, clear or otherwise, and adopt the R&R as the decision of the C ourt. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion, (Doc. 30), enter judgment for Plaintiffs as described in the R&R, and close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/15/2019) (mml) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
