Krizek v. Queens Medical Center et al
| Helena Krizek |
| Dr. Ittikorn Spanuchart, Dr. Matthew Dumochel, Hawaii Residency Program (HRP), Dr. Nobuhiro Ariyoshi, Dr. Hao Chih Ho, Dr. Christopher Happy, Dr. Matthew Dumouchel, Dr. T. Scott Gallacher, Dr. Wendy W Hsu, Queens Medical Center and Hawaii Coroner |
| 1:2018cv06481 |
| July 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Paul G Gardephe |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received Return Receipt of Mail Order by Certified Mail as to Helena Krizek 244 West 64th Street #6H New York, NY 10023, which was served by Certified Mail # 7002 2410 0005 1439 6587. (vba) |
| Received e-mail from the United States District Court - District of Hawaii acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 1:18-cv-00293, filed on 08/02/2018. (sjo) |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of District of Hawaii (cf) |
Filing 4
ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, and to close this case. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order by certified mail to Plaintiff, and to note mailing on the docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 7/25/2018) (cf)
|
| Mailed a copy of #4 Order by Certified Mail # 7002 2410 0005 1439 6587 to Helena Krizek 244 West 64th Street #6H New York, NY 10023 with Return Receipt Requested. (rro) Modified on 7/31/2018 (rro). |
| Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #4 Order to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (cf) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (pne) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nobuhiro Ariyoshi, Hawaii Coroner, Christopher Happy, Matthew Dumouchel, T. Scott Gallacher, Hao Chih Ho, Christopher Happy, Hawaii Residency Program (HRP), Hao Chih Ho, Wendy W Hsu, Ittikorn Spanuchart, Matthew Dumochel, Nobuhiro Ariyoshi, Queens Medical Center, Ittikorn Spanuchart, T. Scott Gallacher, Wendy W Hsu. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 465401214065)Document filed by Helena Krizek.(pne) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Hawaii Residency Program (HRP), Dr. Ittikorn Spanuchart. (pne) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Dr. Nobuhiro Ariyoshi, Hawaii Residency Program (HRP). (pne) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Dr. Matthew Dumouchel. (pne) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Dr. T. Scott Gallacher. (pne) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Dr. Christopher Happy. (pne) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Dr. Wendy W Hsu. (pne) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Dr. Hao Chih Ho. (pne) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Queens Medical Center. (pne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
