Diaz v. Mavis Discount Tire, Inc.
| Edwin Diaz |
| Mavis Discount Tire, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv07904 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Gregory H Woods |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: By letter dated October 22, 2018, Plaintiff has informed the Court that this case has settled. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action be conditionally discontinued without prejudice and without costs; provided, however, that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the parties may submit to the Court their own Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal. Otherwise, within such time Plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the active calendar of this Court in the event that the settlement is not consummated. Upon such application for reinstatement, the parties shall continue to be subject to the Courts jurisdiction, the Court shall promptly reinstate the action to its active docket, and the parties shall be directed to appear before the Court, without the necessity of additional process, on a date within ten (10) days of the application, to schedule remaining pretrial proceedings and/or dispositive motions, as appropriate. This Order shall be deemed a final discontinuance of the action with prejudice in the event that Plaintiff has not requested restoration of the case to the active calendar within such 30-day period. The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 10/23/2018) (jca)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement . Document filed by Edwin Diaz. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Mavis Discount Tire, Inc. served on 9/7/2018, answer due 10/24/2018. Service was accepted by Nancy Doughtery, Agent. Document filed by Edwin Diaz. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting in part #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Application granted in part. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to October 24, 2018. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 10/3/2018) (anc)
|
| Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Joseph J. DiPalma dated 10/03/18. Document filed by Mavis Discount Tire, Inc..(DiPalma, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph James DiPalma on behalf of Mavis Discount Tire, Inc.. (DiPalma, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph James Lynett on behalf of Mavis Discount Tire, Inc.. (Lynett, Joseph) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Mavis Discount Tire, Inc. answer due 10/24/2018. (anc) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 10/30/2018 at 03:40 PM in Courtroom 12C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Gregory H. Woods; and as further set forth in this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/28/2018) (anc)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Mavis Discount Tire, Inc.. (pne) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Mavis Discount Tire, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Edwin Diaz. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mavis Discount Tire, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-15510276)Document filed by Edwin Diaz.(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Diaz v. Mavis Discount Tire, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edwin Diaz | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H Mizrahi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mavis Discount Tire, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joseph James DiPalma |
| Represented By: | Joseph James Lynett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
